Give this film a little bit. In terms of values, standard Nordic style and old nihilism are in line with my appetite. On the camera, outside the battlefield, the contrast between cold and warm is quite good. In the battle scene, the tactical actions are in place, and the battlefield description is powerful. The explosive dose is sufficient, and no gasoline is added to show the fire. Victory, stagnation, and defeat have all been revealed. These commendable true portrayals are the most important reason why I recommend this film. Outside the battlefield, discussions and descriptions of human nature fall into the trap. The men are unknown soldiers on the battlefield. Outside the battlefield, they are fathers, husbands, sons, brothers, ordinary workers and peasants. They triumphed, retreated, persevered, grew, wounded, and died on the battlefield. Every soldier is of little importance to this war, but to their family, they are heaven. In addition to men, women, and children were all trapped in the mudslides of war, rushing to the lower reaches of history, struggling powerlessly and uselessly. The plot is indeed a running account. The historical narrative from beginning to end is as plain as water, but it suits my appetite. The European leftists accused it of being partial to the Nazis and promoting nationalism, but as far as the fragmented soldiers watched the colonel being crushed by T-34/85, the Finns were still Finns after all. (Communism and the origin of mankind are also discussed in this film. Are they on the left? They have all begun to abandon the labor movement, and have the face to criticize the nationalism of the 1940s?) This commemorative film about the founding of Finland has been remaked for the third time. The effect of this remake is outstanding. Even though the Soviet Union was gone, Mao Zi could only stare at the satellite national anti-Soviet films that year.
View more about Tuntematon sotilas reviews
