After reading the first reaction, I gave 5 stars, and I went out to get some water to calm down and I wanted to give 4 stars. Think about it and give it five stars. I decided to write a film review first and then read the short review, so as not to affect my judgment.
The college will be screened tonight. I originally wanted to watch it with everyone at the college, but because a few close friends didn't go there, and the world room chair was uncomfortable, I wanted to go home and watch it on netflix.
The title of the film is very burning. After three months of edification in the most hideous part of the documentary in the United States (I am really proud), I can now accurately judge that this title is very popular with the audience. I just asked the editing advisor to finish the editing in class this afternoon, and all the tips can be followed by watching the film again. The group portrait is well done, it is not messy at first, and each character is very vivid and will not be confused. Their respective story arcs are also different, with some happy endings and some worrying. The photography of Alex is very good (I visually observed that these four characters were taken by different photography). The vote turned out that the verite shot of the party scene was very good. Under the condition of such chaotic sound on the scene, everything that should be captured was captured. Both the front and back shots. The mid-range to the close-up were all in place. A pan shot was also given. It's amazing. In addition, I like the scene where the campaign team called to canvass for the Alex part. The close-ups were very well captured, and the cutting rhythm was also very good, and the tension came out all of a sudden. (If I want to communicate with the filming team and the director group, or communicate with the venue or grant, I have to shoot and cut this way!) In short, I think Alex’s part is very suitable for filming similar topics. of.
No matter how tough the aesthetics of the old and beautiful audiences are, and no matter how bad their favorite topics are, they can't escape the fate of "happy ending". Alex's happy ending is still popular, and his emotions go up all at once (imagine the upward trend of stocks). Finally, revisit without forgetting to push the emotions, this is called compelling character.
In class today, the teacher gave a proposal feedback, saying what is the standard for netflix to produce films: compelling character, doing extrodinary things, in the center of social issue. Actually, it’s not hard to find good questions, the key is You have to find a good way of thinking. When I was in undergraduate creative training, I actually heard similar words: "There are no questions that can't be filmed, all stories are good stories", "Documentary is the life of me seeing others", and "extraordinary people do ordinary things." "Things", or "ordinary people do extraordinary things" all mean the same thing in the final analysis. As for why I didn't shoot when I was undergraduate? At that time, being playful and not sensible was on the one hand, and on the other hand, it was influenced by the surrounding environment, absorbed in skills, and only caught a cold with the goal of "completion". Think about it. One day in my freshman year, an article describing the "impulsiveness" of our school’s journalism students was reposted overwhelmingly by angry students of our school. The polite honorifics made no secret of the mockery of the author of the article. At that time, I was busy preparing for an exam that was very important to me (people who are familiar with me should know what I was doing at the time hahaha), and I was not blown by the clarion call of revolution. It’s just that when I myself have already graduated from the so-called "ace college" of my alma mater, the "ace major" of the so-called "ace college", and came to a higher level of academic industry center for further study, after reading all the sails, I can finally understand that I was held on my head back then. The meaning behind the "impulsive" hat is gone. I don’t want to blame my incompetence in my creation on the teacher’s negligence. Although I was very relaxed in my undergraduate studies, and now I can’t breathe in my daily study and creative life, but I’m still very grateful to the undergraduate college and school for giving me the lenient. I’m very grateful for the environment for my exploration and growth, and I’m very grateful that the teachers here now demand my high standards.
Back to the film. At the end, Alex shed tears in front of the White House recalling his father, and I followed the soreness of my nose-although I was very resistant, but as my proposal progressed, I continued to back and forth, and in recent weeks I began to persuade myself to learn to accept Laomei’s values. I am very worried about being transformed, but this is the best way I can think of to help my creation go smoothly. I don't know if I will really start to care after pretending to care about a certain topic for a long time. After all, I am very good at convincing myself. So I thought about writing down this film review note, hoping to look at this short draft later, and find that I am still insisting on being myself.
View more about Knock Down the House reviews
