Make each other's dead ends

Man is a tragic existence. Brave and adept at war like the Hun the Great, scheming like a Roman commander are all great figures who shake the world and weeping ghosts and gods. But there is such a dead spot, one is that the heroes are sad at the Beauty Pass, and the other is the foolish loyalty of unknown origin. They click each other and die in the end. The so-called causal karma is the so-called non-attachment.
Although the male number one is the Xiongnu the Great, it is the Roman commander who really shines. The personality and destiny of the Hun the Great are simple and straightforward, and the self-construction of the innate and theocracy adds bravery and strategy, which is clear at a glance. The Roman commander was much more treacherous. Such a clever and witty person manipulates the destiny of many nations and nations, but cannot clearly examine the motivation and purpose of his actions. He was captured by a huge blind loyalty, and I think he will never fail to realize the hostile and necessary interaction between himself and the Emperor Xiongnu. He must have foreseen the moment he was stabbed to death in the Roman palace hall. However, this is his wish. It is also his perseverance, his "Achilles" heel, which originated from the Roman Empire that he loved deeply, this powerful, or he fantasized about its powerful "father". The Theppus complex "fear of castration"? If the film explains his growth background, experience, etc., this character will definitely be richer and more three-dimensional and more thought-provoking.
In short, the film is very "good-looking", but it is because of this that it is a bit simple and simple, and the romance is excessive. Apart from the visual differences in clothing, food and lodging, the Huns seem to have no essential difference with the Romans. However, this is definitely impossible. The Huns and Romans, barbaric tribes and civilized society must have faced spiritual conflicts such as the violent integration and collision of thinking styles, life conventions, value orientations, and social structures. It is not just that the Emperor Xiongnu would raise his sword to the sky and scream out somehow, while the Roman commander would not. Check out how fascinating it is. Why was it not the Huns but the Visigoths who destroyed the Western Roman Empire? It’s a pity that “the past is unavailable”, the past can never be restored. It’s just that in the process of constant attempts, countless more or less romances have created countless new Huns and a new history of Roman decline. They gather Together, let this mystery become more shining and moving.

View more about Attila reviews