I don't know what to say after watching "Stalingrad". First of all, the battle of Stalingrad, the most cruel war in human history, is not suitable for applying the narrative of "Pearl Harbor". Secondly, in the face of grand subjects, it is not advisable to blur the event itself as a background, and instead describe personal feelings in detail. After all, it is not the perspective of "Soldiers in the City". Moreover, the beginning and the end of the film are puzzling, because Mao wants to involve the earthquake in Japan? It seems that you want to insinuate the Great Kanto Earthquake in 23 years? Why is the European battlefield talking about East Asia? To tell a story in the ruins?
View more about Stalingrad reviews
