The assassination of the Gestapo is another movie delayed by its name. . .
With low expectations, he found many surprises. The first half describes the history of Gestapo’s leader Heydrich, and the latter describes the unfolding of the great apes until the final demise.
The portrayal of the SS is very vivid. The executions in the several executions were neither too bloody, but also appropriate to let people experience the taste of being charred. They did not deliberately emphasize the Jews, and they also avoided this cliché but difficult subject.
The cold-toned painting style, the winter scenery, and the large areas of snow are reminiscent of Schindler's list, and there are also such arrangements. However, Schindler did not regard the SS chief as the protagonist, but the first owner of this film is Heydrich. The long-term repetition of the high-ranking Nazi officials has not been exaggerated. Instead, it has been flattened. Make people feel real
Different people have different opinions about switching the protagonist midway. Not everyone is Hitchcock. I personally think this film is a bit complicated, and the narrative is not concise enough (just compare Schindler’s list)
The climax appeared in the second half. The specific splendid chase and gunfighting scenes were no longer praised. In the end, Liditzer’s massacre was accompanied by Heydrich’s funeral. There was an atmosphere of Godfather’s baptism and massacre. The rhythm suddenly accelerated. Contrast, emotion comes out.
It is the protagonist description of Heydrich that makes us pay attention to and experience this Gestapo, not only from the perspective of anti-fascism, but still can achieve a great reflection, anti-war and anti-law effect. Unfortunately, the two Insufficient depiction of a martyr, and a relatively chaotic storyline transition
View more about The Man with the Iron Heart reviews
