The feminist part is very creative, but one thing to note is that this is not all of feminist rights. I think modern feminism has two key points:
1. Rights and obligations are always complementary to each other, only talking about rights, not about obligations, only asking for new interests and not giving up existing interests, and will not get more support.
2. Have a clear understanding of the differences brought about by differences in the physiological level
Regarding the first point, because the film is a voice for women's rights, it is understandable to ignore the vested interests of existing women, but it does not mean that it does not exist. For example, the high economic status brought about by the relatively high productivity of men corresponds to high pressure and high requirements, including a higher rate of serious illness and mortality than women; if women’s productivity also increases, then the requirements The corresponding economic status and right to speak are completely reasonable, but at the same time, please accept the corresponding pressure and requirements . Women's rights who recognize this and actively strive for it are the real equal rights: I have made money, and I have a share of my contribution to buying a house, so my name is on the property certificate, ok; my salary is controlled by myself, ok ; It’s ok if you don’t want to have children. And like Mi Meng, who feels that society treats women unfairly on the one hand, and on the other hand clamors that "men don't spend money for you, they don't love you". Let's ask you to return to the feudal era to be princesses.
The second point is the difference in the physiological level. Some people always think that saying that women are not suitable for a certain occupation is a kind of gender discrimination. Then I say that women are not suitable for studying civil engineering, and women are not suitable for moving bricks. Is it discrimination? If you can cut your hair, roll up your sleeves and be tanned in the sun, then you will know who is discriminating against you. If there are fewer female politicians, scientists, and big businessmen, all are sexist, so are the fewer female miners, soldiers, and criminals all sexist? To put it bluntly, I just think well. Discrimination in the eyes of pastoral feminist rights is often an objective reality. Competent women can break through even 1% of the statistical probability to achieve their goals, but acid people will only curse sexism there. Life is not equal. You are more handsome than me. Is it discrimination? Are you a rich second generation? Is it discrimination? I'm not saying that sexism does not exist, but that you should not throw all the pots on it to cover up your failure.
Some time ago, I read some texts of the feminist movement in the 20th century in the United States, and I felt the difficulties of the feminist movement. In the same sentence, the revolution is not a treat to dinner. If you look to people like Mi Meng, the equal rights of men and women in China are only seen in dreams.
View more about I Am Not an Easy Man reviews
