The point that made me reflect on this movie is actually that the body movements combined with facial expressions in different languages can bring completely different feelings, and even this feeling can rise to the cultural level.
When I was in France before, I always felt that the French gave me a sense of natural pride, which made me very uncomfortable. This kind of pride comes from many aspects, and I believe most of it lies in their cultural and artistic history. The French speak with an accent, an indifferent temperament, and a natural stinky face, which really makes me want to punch them at any time (the expressions when they say mais ouais come to mind, With white eyes). But to be honest, I also like to treat others with the usual indifferent face and white eyes.
When I was studying French, the teacher said that French was very rigorous in grammar, so I chose to use French as the official language of the United Nations. Learning French can make your thinking more rigorous and logical. It turns out that there are too many individual differences. At least I don’t think I have a logical ability. Enhanced. I admire their ability to think. They don't believe in the established logic and what you give, but have doubts about anything and anyone.
French people can debate with you at any time. They are too easy to disdain other people's ideas. They have their own logic, it is difficult to listen to other people's suggestions, and it is even harder to try to think about problems with other people's logic. This kind of stubbornness bores me, but this kind of persistence can even be said to be paranoid. It is indeed easier to make many things appear natural, which is the nature that Eastern culture cannot reach. Eastern culture pays attention to subtlety and tactfulness, preferring "still holding the pipa half-hidden", and the most important thing is the unspoken sentence. Eastern culture cares more about refuting people's face, and it seems respectful if it is not arguing.
When I watched this movie, I knew that it was a film that the Orientals couldn't make. Only the French made it, and it didn't look awkward. I even feel that there are many moments that are not acting at all, they are just real expressions. For example, I have always seen the truth in Westerners’ sexual expressions; for example, when they stand on the streets and carnival moments of passion, or when they stand up to each other because of their disagreeable opinions, those tiny facial twitches always make me , An ordinary viewer understands that this is like a documentary at all. At this point, I understand that only Westerners can do it. Orientals can only use the word "performance" when photographed, but when it comes to French people, it just expresses emotions. At this time, it reminded me of another movie with a similar editing technique, "The Life of Adele".
Next, I think about the radicals.
I am not a person who likes violent methods and emotional expressions. I often understand that emotional expressions that are too intense will often end in uselessness and regret later. In the film, these young people rushed into the research institute and smashed their blood bags at the crowd to express their moments of anger. I wondered in my heart, could it be changed? Is it because of their useless emotions? The way of expression has led to more and more stigma, thinking that this group is always accompanied by chaos, repetition, and even sordid disdain. At the same time, I understand better that people who have this kind of idea naturally cannot be reformers. Pioneers are often not able to refute themselves, and radicals are firm in their beliefs.
This kind of film can be shot more.
View more about BPM (Beats Per Minute) reviews
