I accidentally watched this movie, but I didn’t expect the male lead to be Nizi. I wanted to see the pinholes in "The Warm Corpse" back then. For the male lead’s face, even if I scatter dog food crazily, I must make up my mind to take this movie. After watching the movie.
In the first 15 minutes of the movie, it was like a soft show for Tantan. The male protagonist Martin and the female protagonist Gabi had a chance to meet each other in a row. (There was a very interesting detail during the period. M asked G to the bar noodles, M ordered G in advance, but G drank M's wine, and later realized that G was afraid of being drugged) After they met, the two began a romance. , So he reluctantly ate dog food for another 30 minutes, and glanced at the progress bar. Oh my god, two hours in total! From now on, I won’t keep talking about this little couple who are too tired of being in love... Thinking of this in my heart, the screenwriter really made a big move.
The two had a big fight because they didn't meet frankly, and then they went to other people to cheat each other. After some tossing, the two wanted to save the relationship again, and even found a therapist for psychological construction. Under the therapist’s suggestion, the two decided to be honest and open, and established an open-ended approach based on this. relation.
emmmmmmm... First, let me explain what an open relationship is. Open relationship (English: Open Relationship) is a kind of interpersonal relationship. Limitations of monogamy. (From Wikipedia)
I really realized the open relationship at first because of Francis and Claire in "House of Cards" , which opened the door to my new world for the political couple. At that time, they exclaimed "wow! There is such a marriage relationship."
However, Francis and Claire were able to overcome all obstacles in the calculated political dangers and always maintain such an open relationship, and even use such a relationship to dominate the situation. However, M and G in the film fell apart after various stimulating attempts. , The last two people are getting more and more distant. The reason that appears in the film is probably that it is difficult for both of them to be open and honest .
M knew from a friend that his ex-wife gave birth to a child, and the reason for his divorce from his ex-wife was because of a miscarriage, M ran away. Because G had befriended a wealthy and powerful elder, he was attracted by the masculine charm of the long battle field, and hid the necklace the other party gave him, so a crack occurred.
Is the crack caused by a concealment? It is certainly not the case. 100% honesty between partners is as false as a person saying that he never lied. Compared to Francis and Claire's love and killing each other, such simple factors are even more meaningless.
So what exactly caused the collapse of open relationships? Roughly it should be related to the independence and balance of the two in this relationship . For example, this is similar to a master game. Only two people who are connected to each other and independent of each other, and who are truly commensurate in strength and cherish each other in character, can play a wonderful game. Another image is like Francis and Claire, they have the same connection point, and support each other to climb the summit of power. In the relationship between the two parties, they are not limited to the husband and wife, but are more like partners who put aside gender restrictions. If we are evenly matched, we can "rely on our strength to go up to the blue sky." If one of us wants to be one head higher, then the other must kill his spirit.
The topic is far away, and then back to the relationship between M and G in the movie. From the small details at the beginning, we can see that M is a cowardly person. The failure of the first marriage, the unwillingness after the failure but did not try to restore it. (There is a very interesting detail in the film. M's ex-wife is Asian. When M and G decide to try an open relationship, M chooses to date mostly Asian.) Even if they decide to try an open relationship, G suggested it. And G, I don’t know if it’s because she is studying psychology. This girl always wants to control. Compared with M's cowardice, G's control seems to be fulfilled. G switched to the relationship with the latter elder, and his position in control was not guaranteed. (There are two small details in the film that are worth noting. The first is that when the elder invites G to live in Europe together, G immediately texts M, wants to meet; the second is that after the elder’s house invites G’s rival, G asks to invite this person out. The elder disagrees and is very disappointed with G, commenting that G is like a naive teenager. (I am ashamed) G starts to feel insecure, and wants to return to the relationship with M. (There is also a small detail worth noting, that is, there are always many cracks on the G mobile phone. This can show that G is a very emotional person. He cares about whether others are controlled by himself. Thought about patching)
Two people want to escape, and the other wants to take control. It's not surprising that they collapsed too fast. Such a pair's pursuit of an open relationship will inevitably leave scars on their hearts! Because the two people do not manage this relationship in an independent and balanced position at all, those seemingly charming smiles, those vows made after being frank, those tentative eyes in unruly attempts, those after discovering the problem The hysteria of this kind of thing proves that most CPs really can't afford this kind of relationship. At the end of the film, the screenwriter touched his conscience and gave a regression-like ending. Personally, it is a bit far-fetched, because the essential problem between the two has not been resolved, and there is still a long way to go in the future.
PS: Finally put on Nizi’s prosperous beauty
View more about Newness reviews
