It's purely personal evaluation. It's nothing more than complaining. If you don't like it, don't spray.
If the director is a vegetarian, then I have nothing to say. First, what do you want to express in the opening shot? Human beings dominate the destiny of animals, and human beings are superior? Human play god? Then stop eating meat. I feel that the director’s idealism is too strong. Okay. I admit that part of the reason is that I was eating at the time and the internal organs fell out. I almost vomited, but I am quite disgusted with this simple and crude expression of contempt. Method, human beings really dominate everything, but not eating beef can explain this problem. That is to say, the director started from the beginning of the film. The next story is to catch a dog and go to a shelter. Is it wrong? Is it wrong that the shelter cannot afford to euthanize seriously ill dogs? No one adopted and put them there hungry? If you want to express that humans do not have the right to decide the life and death of other species, this kind of controversial issue should not be too biased towards which side. It would be too naive to simply criticize the side opposed to the dog. If the director wants to mirror the darkness of racism Face, then I really didn’t think that the director himself was not a potential racist. Let's talk about the various evils of people and dog abuse, and then the dog is upset, so the dog will start to tear people, so what is the difference between a dog and a vicious human? It's just that the order is different.
And I think the director did not focus on the point that can really deepen the theme. After experiencing all kinds of dissatisfaction, the little girl made the decision to give up looking for a dog. She told her father that I didn't want a dog anymore, of course because she found that her stillness had brought pain to her family. Then how many people abandon the dog use this as an excuse, because it affects others, because the family is unhappy, so I can't raise you anymore, you fend for yourself. Isn't this the best proof of human beings' contempt for dogs and the role of God? It's just an idea that may end a life. I was expecting a strong stroke here, but it was just an understatement. Maybe the director feels that it is not worth mentioning compared with the dog's revenge.
Thinking about this film carefully, there is almost no mention of the essential causes of the series of problems. It just blindly narrates the cruelty of humans and the killing of dogs left by the climax. The theme is superficial, and I personally think that there is no depth. But I have to say that the last shot caught my heart. The shot was beautiful. The little girl crawled in the eyes of the dogs, representing human beings and accepting the trial. In the end, everything returned to peace. If there is no last shot, I would think this director is terrible.
View more about White God reviews
