After watching the first time, I was misled very seriously. After reading some film reviews, I found it was not so simple. Then I went to watch it again. Later, I found out that the teacher had somehow tricked the police’s daughter into giving her a birthday. It should be I lied to the dance teacher because the police's wife said on the phone that her daughter could not be contacted after the police picked it up, but the police did not pick it up. Also, on the phone, the teacher’s wife refused to let him see his daughter. Those few conversations showed that he also committed an unforgivable sin against his daughter. Later, during the interrogation, he wanted to pick up the fact that he had a daughter. The police and Ji Di were actually lying. I suspect that after he became a father, he was affected by perverted desires when he saw his daughter’s smile and so on. After pedophilia, in reality, who can say that there is no such father who has no such idea, but most of the time reason overcomes desire. That paragraph of what the police said during the follow-up call with his wife may have been heard by the teacher. He failed to celebrate his daughter’s birthday, but it happened that the police’s daughter also had a recent birthday, so he caught sight of the police’s daughter. The clues to why Ji Di can be certain that the perverted teacher did it are actually very obvious. Before the interrogation, Ji Di read a fairy tale. Why is the act of delivering the cake no different from what the teacher did to the police daughter? He also said that it was adapted from the truth. It can be seen that he also followed the perverted teacher to investigate, and saw how the teacher lied to a girl before he was convinced that he was perverted. There are two girls in his fairy tale, one of which is his daughter. Because after seeing the teacher's actions, he guessed that his daughter was tricked into the bait in the same way. This is not the point. The point is how did he know that they were two girls? Obviously. When the police finally ran to say that his daughter was in his hands, he should have realized that the kidnapped girl he saw was the police's daughter, so he was not too surprised. In the last scene, another policeman went to search the house and found a girl doll and also hinted, but why didn't the police enter the room?... Anyway, the teacher is dead. If the police daughter is still alive, it will be discovered sooner or later and has been lost. It should have been gone. Finally, let's talk about the part of Ji Di digging the pit. Seeing that there is white in the last pit, it may be the head that was installed. Is it because Ji Di didn't get her daughter's head because of the anger of being teased that he died cheaply? In the end, I think it is very reasonable to understand the plot like this. When the police started to suspect they used lynching, which caused him to lose his job. In order to prove himself, he insisted on suspicion, but he was not really convinced in his heart, so he finally wavered, and also wavered when he tortured the teacher. But Ji Di really witnessed the teacher's criminal process, so he was completely convinced. There is a basis for saying that he followed the teacher. The police have no tools to follow the teacher, so it is easy to be spotted. The teacher should have known it all the time, but Ji Di has a telescope. The lens of the telescope was given more than once. Isn't it emphasizing something? So when he stood far away, he could still find the police following him. So I think those blind-spraying plots are unreasonable, saying that two people blindly suspect that until the end is that they didn't understand the plot.
View more about Big Bad Wolves reviews
