Two college students, Ethan and Sean, started a series of "pranks" on a neighbor who lives alone, a widowed old man.
"Wow! It's so boring! You can use the tools you buy in the supermarket to simulate the scenes of horror movies: flashing lights, flashing TVs, automatically opening and closing wooden doors, disc players playing dance music inexplicably late at night, suddenly Cracked glass. This is a popular science revealing movie."
"It's worthy of being a talented MIT student. His hands-on skills are really
amazing ! But it is illegal to invade other people's houses and install monitors." "It's really two bear kids. The house is turned into a haunted house, and it
sounds like a'behavioral intervention' experiment." ——The above is my inner OS, infinit, which is a bit boring.
As for my three questions, the film also gave the answers appropriately.
Q1: How are the subjects selected?
"He (neighbor) drinks, abuses dogs, beats his wife! He is not a good person." This is S's statement. Moreover, being close to facilitate close observation and timely response.
Q2: The experiment lasted for six weeks. S's mother entered S's bedroom many times, but she did not respond to the three large displays. You know, these two experimenters obtain experimental data 24 hours a day?
"A young man in his 20s, he doesn't go to nightclubs, gangsters, or drugs, but he always stares at the big screen. As for what he's watching...How good are the children from Mu's family?" This is the speech of Mother S. Moreover, it is chaotic like a "canine home", and it is estimated to have a taste. The mother's inner drama should be "make it hard."
Q3: Why did the neighbor not choose to call the police after experiencing so many "haunted incidents"?
In fact, in the first "Light TV Ghost", the police officer found that the voltage was unstable and came to the door in time: "Would you mind..." Our middle school English teacher taught it. This is a euphemism, "Do you mind... "when police officers asked to check into the house, the neighbor replied:" Yes, I do "(What a rude old man ah.).
neighborhood out garbage, trash halfway down, a dog The person and his dog were passing by. The dog "Bhaw" stepped on the rubbish. The owner of the dog stepped forward and asked if he needed help (the big trash bin fell out). The neighbor's answer was "Take your dog and walk away smoothly." , Otherwise I will unload him and put it in a box and send it to you!" (Tsk tusk, really violent, weirdly old man!)
"The basement he (neighbor) entered after the haunted incident must have hidden secrets , He must have killed his wife and hid the body there. So, how dare he let the police enter the house and search it!" This is S's statement.
Regardless of E's dissuasion, S insisted on going to the basement to find out. The facts proved that it was really just an ordinary utility room. S ghost brought out a bell, and when he picked up the bell, the bell woke up the neighbor. S didn't have time to run out, he hid under the curtain of a table in the living room, holding a gun in his hand, holding his breath. The neighbor saw the bell, he went back to the room, and when he returned to the living room, he also had a gun in his hand.
"Bang!" A gunshot sounded, and the neighbor fell in a pool of blood. The old man committed suicide.
After the two men dismantled the surveillance equipment and prepared to move the corpse, the police broke into the door. Everything that S and E did was recorded by themselves. This is the testimony presented in court.
The judge defined their behavior as "torture" in the verdict, which couldn't be more precise. A lonely old man with a rickety body and gray hair was tortured over and over again:
his wife urged him to repair the door, and his wife was very pleased to see the door repaired. But what's the point of the door when the wife is gone? The neighbor swung an axe and chopped it down.
That disc player was playing music that his wife liked. When the wife learned that she was seriously ill, she suffered a nervous breakdown. The neighbors embraced her and danced to encourage her.
That bell was a gift from a neighbor to his wife. His wife didn’t even have the strength to shout loudly. When the neighbor gave her the bell again, he said: "As long as you shake the bell, I will rush to you whenever and wherever. "
The demise of life shouldn't be fooled!
The punishment for S and E is two years of community education. Their actions are misdemeanors. American law stipulates that only the death of the victim caused by the implementation of the felony can be charged with murder. However, the case itself has caused widespread controversy, so the experimenter is really red, ironic and disheartening.
Evil for no reason is a bomb that does not know when it will explode, turning oneself into a devil and burying goodness in the grave. The lack of morality and goodness in society makes the law the only code of conduct for some people. They are believers of utilitarianism. The size of the gains and punishments becomes the weight to judge whether it is worth trying. In the movie, the illegal cost of "becoming red" is too low-even if the old people die, they are only two years of community corrections education.
I can't help but speculate that there is also such a logic behind XXXX's random reporting of XXXX. "I just wrote the report in a format that is easier to report successfully. I didn't expect that the article was deleted successfully." "I didn't expect that the monetary appreciation would be returned after the article was deleted, which caused a huge loss of thousands of people. I feel guilty." EXM? ? ? I feel guilty because of the money loss. Don't feel guilty for tens of thousands of readers not seeing the article, don't feel guilty for the death of other people's hard work, don't feel guilty for hurting others with your own malice, just feel guilty for the loss of money. It can only be said that the legal consciousness is very strong.
There will probably be many people who think that XXXX is not doing it right, but more "sane" people should just leave it alone. Because reporting is not against the law, the decision to delete the article does not rest with the reporter; and the reporter admits his mistake so frankly, we should be tolerant. But who can deny it, even XXXX did not deny it. The reporting behavior is nothing else, just to try the rules of XX deletion. As for whether other people will suffer losses due to this, it is not considered.
Don't take evil for small things, don't take good things for nothing!
I think the following words are hypocritical, but because of their truthfulness, I decided to write them out: I want to live in a world of kindness—respect, equality, and mutual help are commonplace. If others are not kind, then I have to learn to be a kind person myself.
PS: My elders once told me that to find a husband does not have to be excellent, but it must be kind and soft-hearted. The sisters around me who have been married for several years all agree that evil is an indiscriminate weapon of destruction.
View more about The Good Neighbor reviews
