#Topic irrelevant#
#Only record the viewing experience, I don’t want to talk about the bigger picture and I don’t have this ability#
First of all, I must admit that I came here for Chris Pine. I don't know anything about this movie except for the "alcohol-related" that can be seen from the name.
The role of Paipi is his consistent style before the transition, a typical American big boy, I have to say that it can be regarded as a natural performance to a certain extent. His own silly white sweet halo can't be concealed by his rough hippie style, including the middle-aged divorced Texas farmer in Hell or High Water, which vaguely reveals a strange sense of cuteness. It can only be said to be temperament. From a technical perspective, Pie Pie always shows a little bit of tongue when he smiles, it looks very sweet and cute. For an actor, this is not a good thing. It will focus the audience's attention on the actor rather than the character itself. Just like Martin Freeman, he is looking at Bilbo, but I think it's Watson walking. But this is not harmful, there are not many actors who can really act like anything, and there is only one Heath Ledger who is not. In addition, although Paipi is the first in the cast, this movie does not have a protagonist in the strict sense. The roles of several roles are similar. The reason why Bo is slightly more important I think is probably because he took it on his own. The word "inspirational" in the label. Of course, the movie itself is not strong in chicken soup, which I also think is quite good. Who said that the big format must be better than the small format?
It was a pleasant surprise to see Alan Rickman. The role of AR is the one that I think is the best in the whole film. It has all the laughs. The natural scenery of California is accompanied by a small country tone, and AR is a bit clumsy and reserved. It is a natural thing for the audience to change from a pursed grin to a toothy grin. One of the scenes is AR monologues wine while gnawing KFC chicken wings. I would like to know how the taste of the wine connoisseur would evaluate the fried chicken ww
Going back to the movie itself, the beginning was a little flat, and I don't know what I wanted to say, but everything soon became clear. The two story lines cross, and the overall atmosphere is relaxed and cheerful, making people want to jump on tiptoe.
There is a shot I particularly like. I would like to describe it in the superficial language of a layman. The angle of view swoops down the curvature of the hillside and then rises to the sam’s cabin, and then extends beyond it to the distance. I have also used similar techniques many times to photograph the vineyards. ,very beautiful.
In addition, the love triangle is quite contradictory. Whether it really happened or the director’s artistic creation, I think it’s a bit redundant and I don’t like it very much.
In general, as a fresh and small production, it is pretty good-looking.
View more about Bottle Shock reviews
