I remember reading "The Cathedral and the Bazaar", a book about hacker culture, and an excerpt from reading notes at that time, to express the difference between the two and the attitude of real hackers:
"Hackers are a group of Enthusiastic enthusiasts, artists, and inventors of something. They are weird geniuses who are keen to solve fascinating problems in beautiful ways. They are weird in technological innovation, but they are brilliant...
......There is a group of people who call themselves "hackers" in a high-profile manner, but they are not hackers because their main purpose is to destroy. Real hackers call them "Crackers" and don't want to talk to them at all .Because hackers believe that "hackers" have no sense of responsibility, have no belief in beauty, and are not very smart." After all,
"007" is not adapted to the new technology era. He mistakenly regarded the hackers as hackers and invited them into the house.
However, hackers are not hackers after all. We can't blame our experienced and well-informed "007". He always feels unfavorable towards the handsome and capable ITguy, although he himself can't tell what's wrong.
It's just that, in the information world of the Internet age, there seems to be little use of "007". The heroes of the big industrial age are obviously already powerless.
A Pierce Brosnan fan movie, watched slowly, without surprises, and calm.
View more about I.T. reviews
