Regardless of the logic of this story, etc., I really don't know what I want to express. The female robot rescues the robot group? Or, according to the idiot policeman’s thinking, such a company itself will overwhelm human desires and increase crime, so it needs to be eliminated? Then what is it that he rushed into this company like this and killed so many security guards? Did they break the law or something? What's wrong with part-time job? Then restore the memory of the robots to cause the robots to riot, thereby harming the real humans who consume inside, and making the security of the area more chaotic. Is this really right? Maybe it's because I am really extreme. Maybe it’s really wrong to use simulated robots to let humans vent their desires, but it’s normal to enter this company all the way, kill so many security guards, kill company executives and others, and let the robots riot. Is such behavior really normal? ? Not breaking the law? ?
Although we knew it was making a movie, we just watched it lively. But this kind of plot, this kind of plot, really makes me unable to agree. It's like promoting a kind of so-called heroism. If you think the company itself has problems, you can rush in and kill the Quartet. It is really speechless.
View more about Vice reviews
