I haven’t read the manga, and when I watched this film, I was confused. The relationship between the electronic brain and the prosthetic body was not clearly explained. I felt that it was a movie story that was intercepted from the original work. The fans are too heavy. The common problem of this kind of movie is that the Conan movie version is the best. Every movie uses the first few minutes to introduce the general story background and the relationship between the characters. This is very important. Not all people will go back after watching the film. Look at the original.
There are not too many battle scenes in this film, but there are many kinds of weapons, and the explanation with subtitles makes me feel like watching Tom Clancy and Metal Gear. Maybe the latter is inspired by the former. After all, the attack on the shell is earlier. . Moreover, the explanations of programs and humans and philosophical discussions in the film account for most of the space, which is not very good as a "commercially oriented" film. The inexplicable Chinese and American elements are too much on the surface. In my eyes, the people in the film are all Japanese, too. After all, these are not the focus of this film.
Human-designed AIs actively apply for political asylum because they carry a large number of secrets. This is a great idea. Even the author doesn't seem to give a suitable answer. In the end, the mixture of humans and programs is more like a taken for granted than technology. In addition, when the flesh becomes something that can be made at will, is human sexual desire completely meaningless?
View more about Ghost in the Shell 2.0 reviews
