One of the outstanding characteristics of the strength of American culture is its "hegemony." No matter which country, religion, or race, there is a complex love-hate relationship with the United States. It is undeniable that the strong, inclusive and attractive American culture has changed the desire and pursuit of advanced culture by people all over the world. But at the same time, it is also affected by political interests and national sentiments. The Arab world has anti-American and pro-American, which is the most typical example. Various countries, including us, do not like the US government, but they have inexplicable complex feelings about American culture. Similarly, culture also serves politics and national interests. When the ideology and values reflected in American movies run counter to ours and run counter to the truth, will you still be passionate about it?
First of all, this movie conceals the truth. This is a far cry from the warning in the opening movie. Most of the responsibility for the outbreak of the 1988 War lies with Saakashvili. The Republic of South Ossetia seeks independence. Georgia's troops suppressed the territory and brutally suppressed it. South Ossetia, which was supported by Russia behind the scenes, turned to Russia for help, and Russia attacked decisively. It is such a truth that both parties are responsible. But from the beginning of the movie, Georgia and Saakashvili were considered weak. It seems that Saakashvili was suddenly invaded by Russia while sitting in the presidential palace? ? ? This is the impression that the film instilled in us. Is it possible, fools believe, this is the Second World War of the last century? Or was it the ancient Roman Empire in the Cold Weapon Era, where weak countries were innocently invaded by powerful countries? ? ? There was no unprovoked conflict, and the fact that Georgia was brutally suppressed. American filmmakers didn’t mention a word. Instead, they turned to South Ossetia supported by Russia. What we saw was the bloody massacre of villagers by the South Ossetian army like a ghost entering the village. . . . Hehe, American filmmakers are really poor. The facial makeup scripts of our old movies such as "Tunnel Warfare" and "Plain Guerrilla" of the last century are even talked about by Americans today.
Secondly, the plot is terrible! I don't know which paragraph to say. The protagonist is always dead. In Iraq, the car was sieved, and even the female colleague who was crawling under the car was killed. The protagonist escaped the bullets while sitting high; The protagonist meets with a South Ossetian officer on Stalin Square. The officer wants to kill him, but the camera stops for N seconds. The muzzle is on his forehead, but he doesn’t shoot. It seems that the director over there is shouting, "Keep moving, keep moving, You'll be killed by someone else in a while...", sure enough, the officer who held the gun high but didn't shoot was headshot by a little friend! ! ! The protagonist just has a lot of fate, CAO, cheating this is, or insulting our IQ; in order to retrieve the memory card, the protagonist ran to the garden, almost effortlessly pulled out from the ground, it looks like he buried it in the first place, but it’s a pity He didn’t know, he could only say that the protagonist was lucky. In such a big site, he could easily find evidence at such a critical juncture by just squatting down. What’s even more funny was that he was looking for a memory card here. The convoy continued to fight, the Georgian convoy in front ran desperately, and the South Ossetian army in the back was in hot pursuit. Under such a situation, the protagonist found the memory card and went out of the garden to get into the car. . . MLGB, your feelings are in circles! There is another plot. The newlyweds got married and were bombed. The bride and father ran away. Finally, they were found by the hero and heroine, holding hands and crying. Family affection infected each of us. . . But the good times didn't last long. The bride's father confessed the true identity and memory card of the protagonist reporter in order to protect his daughter and himself. Then, the daughter and the heroine were disappointed. . . Then what. . . Then what. . . , And then the bride and the heroine left their father without hesitation, without looking back! ! ! ! . . . Kao, you fooled your father. You raised such a big girl and left yourself without hesitation. She didn't even have a crying expression. She looked like a stranger. The brainwashing of emotional American values can make people deny their parents. what! ! !
In short, this film serves ideology through and through. The Russian army has nothing to praise, but it is definitely not what the Americans say. You American films often depict the psychological journey of both sides of the war, and let the audience through the changes in the thoughts of living characters. Have a more profound and clear understanding of war. Such as: Field Platoon, Rescue Private Ryan, etc. But is this movie swollen? It completely ignores the facts and portrays the villain Saakashvili like an innocent daughter-in-law!
Not to mention, the eyes of the audience are discerning. It is not ideology that needs to be glorified, but the innocent people under the persecution of war!
View more about 5 Days of War reviews
