1. The heroine is ugly. The movie I watched yesterday, 9.11, reminded me that she has the face of a Middle Eastern lady, with her hair draped down and she can still see from a distance. She unintentionally flirted back and pulled out a mahjong tile from the boss.
2. The heroine has a poor temperament. Taking an AV is hurting her body, and she can tell from her skin and eyes that she is actually very disabled. The poster is not bad, and close-ups of her face with heavy makeup are okay, but as long as she moves or opens her mouth, it is like throwing a stone into the calm lake, and the remaining youthful breath is instantly broken, reminding The audience really is not a delicate and sensitive GF EXP provider as described in the film, but a heavy-tasting Western meat toilet.
3. It's okay to have a bad temperament, but it's forced. Could Ti Godal be able to pretend to be a literary youth? Can you appear thoughtful? Isn't this a hype that aroused people's compassion for her "quality and cleanness"? It's disgusting. There are thoughtful and talented prostitutes. There are a lot of Chinese ancient records, but they are different. The record does not say that Su Xiaoxiao can do deep throat and anal.
4. Obviously he has a vulgar temperament, and he always puts on a pose and pretends to be deep and elegant, thinking that it is acting. During the film's dialogue, she didn't know where to put her eyes, and the stiff expression that looked like a smile made people feel jealous. This kind of acting is purely in the A film stage. Acting has to be talented. It’s not that you can put on the clothes you take off one by one if two people lift you up.
5. After all, what is this director doing? It is the director's responsibility to induce the actor and let her express herself. And what is shown in this movie is a hypocritical self. The performance of other actors is also ridiculous, and they are trying their best to'perform' naturally. But naturally there is no need to perform. If the real goal of the director is political and economic, then it is really vulgar if you rely on GF EXP to grab the gimmick, especially for such a'master'-level director. Even if you really want to use sex as a gimmick, please be more authentic and learn from Michael Moore. How can people make pure documentary films more vivid than feature films?
6. I think Steven Soderburgh's Achilles heel is style. He became famous with the style of a family video, and then he thought that style and methods were the panacea for the film. Sometimes he wanted to add a little special artistry, so he couldn't jump out of this way and became confused. When his thinking is more normal, there will be good works like "Never Compromise", and there will also be nerdy works like the Arhat series; when he starts to become crazy, he will accidentally burst into "Drug Network", but it fails. Works more, like this GF EXP.
7. My opinion is that a special video style is only needed in the following situations:
a. When this video style is the best way to express the content of the film, (to be honest, I think the drug network is too fancy) ;
B. When the image style itself can create content. (Such as Quentin and Wong Kar-wai, but Steven Soderburgh has not yet reached this level. His boring thinking only knows the narrative upside down, and there is no creativity that sparkles.)
Other than that, it is meaningless. Playing tricks, flashy.
8. Girlfriend Experience is the most boring and self-deceptive service invented by Guilao. Find a prostitute who has a hundred times more personal experience than you, and treat her as a lover of first love. One who knows that it is fake has to show his true feelings, and the other who has suffered through the vicissitudes of life has to be innocent and cute. Hey, can you be more nympho? The Chinese are much more savvy. The lesson that bitches are ruthless and the actors have been unjust.
View more about The Girlfriend Experience reviews
