While enjoying the false power temporarily given to me by the plot. On one side, schizophrenia condemned sex worship.
As a woman, as the story develops, she naturally substitutes herself into the dominant position of the female dominator, which is really cool. However, he can’t help but substitute for the male protagonist. His weak role seems to project women who insist on feminism in the real society. They are not understood or even misunderstood. Social maliciousness floods their voices, and they are even considered as individuals. Little tricks to seduce men (I believe the male protagonist was treated this way by the female protagonist at the beginning of the film).
I like this film very much because it gives me a sense of "in power" that is out of reality. This does not refer to the self-respecting "first person in the world", but refers to the easy access to convenient passes in life, the advantage of being acquiesced by society in various things, and so on. The hero's struggle after entering the parallel world is precisely his helplessness and fear after losing these rights advantages. The so-called on the power means that you can do whatever you want within a certain legal limit that will make others unbearable, while being tolerated by the society (sometimes even illegal can be forgiven). However, know that the privileged class will never last long unless what they lose is enough to make up for their privileges. Everyone wants to be an emperor, and everyone is jealous of their rights. In this case, no one can protect their privileges forever.
This is probably the reason why some men rallied and attacked after the rise of feminism and the awakening of women. After all, you can’t call women as you like before and be acquiesced, insult women and be laughed off as a joke, the women around you no longer lower their eyebrows and let them be merciless, but have their own thoughts, and even come to compete with them for resources. Perform better.
Faced with the rise of women, it is ironic that men do not focus on improving their own quality, but try to suppress their development by suppressing women. (Suddenly funny: Isn't this what a despicable country does?)
One more thing, as the title says, everyone yearns for rights, no matter if it's a small benefit or a big benefit. So I tend to think that men and women will put themselves into the perspective of the heroine in power when watching this film at the beginning. The difference is that women’s unique introspection will make them reflect on some of the relationship between the sexes in the next plot, and even Began to condemn the actions of certain women in the play. Therefore, some people with lower ideological consciousness may only think that they are sex-exchange movies when watching a complete drama.
Indeed, the objectively reflected content of the film is only the scope of the plot, and the depth and shallowness of the film is only caused by the difference in the structure of personal thoughts. It may be an interesting paper for sociologists, or it may be just a love story for others.
And who has the standard answer?
View more about I Am Not an Easy Man reviews
