Like Anna Karenina, what happened to her husband and her son to run away with her lover? So miserable. So when I saw that she had sons and daughters and two children, I knew that her extramarital affairs could only be underground (if she only has a husband and no children, then I believe she must be free in the end) if she really eloped and left her children in love. At some level, you have to criticize her. She always feels guilty and cares about her and can't get real freedom. So this ending is what I expected to elope with the two children and it was Pippi who disagreed with her hope. It’s Tata that broke the past and that family broke apart, but Tata wasn’t that she mentioned Pippi’s American English so good. She represented Western democracy and freedom. Tata represented Indian conservativeness. Their ending shows that Western freedom and Indian conservativeness are still there. The inability to integrate her niece’s marriage shows that Hinduism and Islam can co-exist for the sake of relative compromises, but conservative forces still reject Western freedom.
View more about The Married Woman reviews