1. Religious conflict
2. Feminist freedom
3. Homosexuality
The above three points are the core ideas that are obviously involved in the plot. Although in the three-point discussion setting, the first point is not well laid out in the second and third points. It can be said that the religious conflict basically served as a background in the middle and late stages and was not deepened. Explore. (The main role in the early stage led to the story line of Aizaz and the junior couple)
But these three points are coherent by the word or concept of "boundary" that runs through the whole series, so I don't feel that the content is complicated, but the order can be seen.
There are also minor flaws in the development of the relationship line between Piprika and Astar. It is clear that the former has repeatedly discouraged Azaz from instilling Astar’s free thoughts and not to make her unable to accept her own life. By myself, this makes me feel a little bit contradictory. Then, according to the character setting, the relationship develops a bit faster, but it is not unacceptable.
Although there are so many "problems", but! But! But! This is precisely because I like this show, because it is really a very good show.
Asta and Nora are compared because they are both regarded as obedient "little birds" and obedient dolls by their husbands, but Nora abandoned everything, including herself, after seeing her husband's hypocritical love. Asta’s child is different. She is realistic. She is different from Nora who is determined to abandon all her self-finding in the drama. Asta can’t give up her child unfeelingly.
This is also the reason why she has been running on both ends. On the one hand, she loves Piprika and enjoys the time with Piprika, but on the other hand, she still can't let go of the family that makes her so painful.
(Although the child's sense of existence is surprisingly low during the ambiguous period between Astar and Piprika)
She eventually chose to break up with Piprika for the same reason. Although Astar’s reasoning is that she should know her Piprika best, and Piprika, who should not control herself like others, actually manipulated herself by means, but she did not choose to give up both. It is to return to the family, to the family that has controlled her for a long time, indicating that the core reason is actually because Piprika’s behavior prevents her from being accepted by her children (although there is also a doubt here, even if there is no sister-in-law , Wouldn’t the husband use worse excuses to explain the mother’s abandonment behavior to the child?).
Without Piprika’s promotion, perhaps Astar would be content to get temporary happiness with Piprika for the rest of her life, instead of quitting the family actively, because there is still a little breathing space left in the family, and she still pays for her children. Can continue to bear it.
The future of Astar who has returned to the family is conceivable, and it is destined to make people more suffocating and desperate, either heart or death.
And her behavior resembles thousands of mothers who say "I didn't divorce your dad at the beginning for you." She has a triple epitome of female shackles, mother shackles and same-sex shackles on her body.
Mr. Lu Xun said that Nora would either fall or return after leaving (combined with the background of the times), and Nora who could not leave in the play had only a "death".
Astar's mother is the best example. When the daughter questioned her, her mother’s emotions showed that her mother must be aware of these things, but she never thought about resisting. Maybe she had given up resisting and wanted her daughter to accept the reality obediently instead of thinking about it. With unrealistic ideas. Her heart is dead. If Astar fails to pluck up the courage to leave home again, the ending of Astar will only be crueler than that of her mother, because she has seen the light and cannot tolerate the darkness.
View more about The Married Woman reviews
