After watching the four episodes of the documentary, I did not feel that the police had seriously solved the case and the police did not disclose many details. The whole central idea is to prove that Lan Keer committed suicide with mental problems (in fact, there is no evidence). Excused for the hotel. The hotel manager said that the hotel should not take any responsibility for this tragedy. Has mental illness become a natural excuse for death?
The whole film turned out to be an accusation of the Internet explosion. If the police can solve the case quickly, will there be so many people guessing on the Internet? Even think that the hotel is a victim. Would a safe hotel allow its guests to die bizarrely in the hotel or even keep their bodies in the water tank for 19 days?
The exposure of skid row in the whole documentary is the only valuable part, but there is no in-depth analysis and criticism of the whole film. What percentage of the people who died in the slums were caught by the murderer? Shouldn't their justice be served? Is their tragedy more explosive than not going online? Is this beautiful country completely accepting that the poor have no human rights? Isn’t it worth the effort to solve the case if they die? Just like civilians who died in the Middle East, are these people's deaths taken for granted?
View more about Crime Scene: The Vanishing at the Cecil Hotel reviews
