After watching this film, I had a feeling of not being clear, but the impression was very deep.
Most people compare the content of the plot with "Fake Lieutenant". I really don't think it is necessary. The plot is produced around a core, but how to pull a pseudo-religious film to the side of realism? As a film art, he has super Realistic space.
The following paragraph is Tuo’s discussion on atheism. The feelings mentioned above are probably described in this way.
Two elderly farmers, neither drunk, nor friends who have known each other for many years, plan to sleep together in a small room after drinking tea, but A found that B had a silver watch in the last two days, probably A did not know B before There is this silver watch. This person A is not a thief, even an honest person, he is not poor according to the standards of a peasant, but the watch really made him like it, he finally couldn't resist the temptation, so he took the knife, his eyes were open, and he painted with his hands. A cross, a painful prayer: "Lord, please forgive me in Christ!" Then he killed B like a sheep, and took away B's watch.
This movie is not about religion, but about God, and the content of the plot starts with atheism. If religion loses God, then God is dead. All that is left in "Christ in the Tomb" is his body.
View more about Corpus Christi reviews
