A good movie, but the screenwriter and director should treat the audience as fools.

Jarrell 2022-11-24 20:18:53

Basically, they are all pretty good works on military themes, but there are a few bugs that need to be raised. First, strategic missile nuclear submarines, well-based, air-launched, and mobile launches. No matter the method of launching strategic nuclear weapons. They are just launch platforms. The activation of nuclear weapons does require authorization. The parameters of the attack target will also be uploaded. But that is only the last guarantee. Most of the data is to allow the missile itself to attack the target by means of inertial guidance and starlight guidance when all external guidance and remote control fail. But... don't forget, in everyday situations. The missile also receives dedicated military satellite relays and global satellite positioning systems. And they are all key communication. In other words, after the platform is launched, the control of the missile is transferred to the control center. The beginning, middle and end stages. All of them can use a dedicated satellite relay platform to launch missiles and even launch vehicles, or some warheads, and receive guidance information after re-entering and breaking through the black barrier area. (Of course it won’t be a bug like Mission Impossible, reenter with a vehicle). So... in the plot so heroic to kill one's strategic missile nuclear submarine, sincerely... speechless.

After all, if you let the initial missile fall into the sea directly, the warhead safety device is also sufficient to protect the nuclear warhead. Even if something goes wrong, it is at best a dirty bullet. And...you killed your own ballistic missile nuclear submarine. Brothers don't understand. How did the remaining missiles and nuclear warheads on your boat complete when the submarine exploded. The leakage of the submarine reactor must not be any better. The nuclear submarines and nuclear weapons recovery projects that Russia has sunk are all counted annually.

Let’s talk about some of the points that people must refute. For example, what do you farmer know about nuclear weapons? BB still here...hehe. Let me ask you questions about nuclear weapons safety procedures, nuclear weapons launch procedures, and regulations on the use of nuclear weapons. What kind of secrecy and security levels exist in military powers in the world? What is the degree of importance? Do you think that if you only need to rebel against one or two nuclear weapons launch platform officers, you can play a nuclear attack? Don't make trouble. A bunch of military staff and scientific gods have put a lot of hard work on these security measures. Just to prevent accidents.

In the movie, as a strategic nuclear submarine, it is right to hide itself after receiving an attack instruction and not accept any external orders to prevent local tactical deception and countermeasures. But...that's just to ensure the launch. Because... After the launch, the control is naturally transferred to the rear defense control center. As a rear control center, the security level and self-protection capability must be much stronger than the launch platform, and it is absolutely the top priority in wartime. If anyone can survive the first wave of nuclear strikes, it must be here that ranks first. So... even if it’s a pig, the final control will be delegated to the launch platform.

As for the launching platform, the only way to get the key to activate the nuclear weapons and launch them is the authority. And... in the movie... France didn't receive a global blow. It has not been destroyed by the military command structure. Although not many, there are enough French military satellites in orbit. There is no army or country launching electronic warfare against France, so interfere. What... How can the director and screenwriter perform such a tragic story in such a tragic way? Really speechless.

In terms of technology, although my education is not high. The knowledge is not wide, but according to the information that can be found today and I know. The only nuclear weapons that cannot be cancelled after launch are only a few tactical nuclear weapons. For example, some small items such as nuclear bombs, nuclear artillery shells, nuclear landmines, etc., are airdropped (dropped!) of less than ten thousand equivalent. There is also the strategic level of the super old model. For example, in the era without satellites, those things that relied on inertial navigation to fly more than 10,000 kilometers with an accuracy of 500 meters. Because there was no satellite relay in that era, relying on unreliable ground station signal guidance or remote control really couldn't be said to be safe. Therefore, in that era, nuclear weapons that could not be terminated after launch or that might not be terminated after launch might indeed exist. But even so. The fuze insurance structure is also designed to be extremely safe...Even the first and second little virgins and the fake fat guys know how to install fuzes in the mission area and set the altitude unlocking method (pressure? Or radar ranging? Or off-plane) Time verification got the flight altitude automatically set the countdown number of seconds, don’t know, tell me). As you can imagine...the last guarantee. How many safety "valves" are piled up with nuclear weapons today?

The summary is... the movie is very good, but the plot is very nonsense. It is meaningless to die, not a martyr but a fool.

View more about Le chant du loup reviews

Extended Reading

Le chant du loup quotes

  • Aristotle: The human beings come in three kinds: the living, dead and those who go to sea.