I went shopping today and turned to this TV series. There is nothing good about American TV shows these days. I plan to watch this British drama. I don't know, after watching a lot of criminal investigation films early and with a high tolerance, after watching three episodes, I won't watch it anymore and abandon the drama. Just analyzing the first three episodes, I also watched three episodes. But according to the trend of these three episodes, without drastic changes, it is impossible to get better. I'm here to complain about these three episodes. On the whole, the first episode said that the past is not bad. In the second episode, the overall structure of the story is considered to exist, but the plot is full of loopholes. The whole episode is an inexplicable story that will be forced to the interrogation room. In the third episode, the story is plain, but the plot design is bad. The impact of the Three Views, the integrity of the police itself, and even the law and morality. The first episode. Talking about. The police interrogated the stepfather who was suspected of killing the stepdaughter. The technique of suppressing first and then raising highlights the drama and conflicts. But it was the screenwriter who forcibly gave the transition from curb to young. The former suspect always only said no comment. It's very depressing. A police officer was forcibly inserted in the middle to "impress" the suspect with his father-daughter feelings of "truthful money", and he began to speak until he was found lying and basically completed the interrogation, and he could request the prosecutor to file a lawsuit. But you must know that the suspect is so cold that he can beat the stepdaughter to the point of death and then put it in a car and put it in a cast, and then bruise the body of the stepdaughter to deliberately create a calm and cruel lunatic who is alibi. Can you really be touched by the so-called "true love" father and daughter you performed? ? ? ? Illogically forcibly open the psychological line of defense to criminal suspects. But it was an interrogation after all. In life, we all may inadvertently let go of our psychological defenses, right. So, it's just very illogical and extremely impossible, but it's not impossible. Well, I assume that this extremely impossible thing happened, so the "breakthrough point" forced by the screenwriter is a reasonable explanation, and the plot is barely smooth. This is what I said, the first episode is still acceptable. You can still watch it, but the second and third episodes start to be logically chaotic, so that the overall picture is messed up in the end. The second episode. How to say this episode is purely storytelling. A reasonable frame of the story is not meticulously crafted, and the logic is unblocked, resulting in the whole story being told, or two more stories similar to a car crash. Not even torture at all. The previous story. Under the casual fright of the police, and there was a lawyer next to him, the suspect said it himself. Okay, the suspect in this episode is the protagonist. He started to tell the background, characters, development of the plot, climax, and ending of the story. Okay, the suspect has finished telling such a novel story. The interrogators who watched from behind clapped their hands and applauded. Yes, we directly got the confession of the criminal suspect. It does not check whether the evidence is in line with the case, the testimony of the witnesses, and the sequence of the case development. These are all the suspects are talking about themselves. Well, the story ends here. It's a dull and reasonable case and script. The police’s self-certifications that are not shown are deemed to have been certified by themselves, or they do not need to be too cautious. It is enough for the spectators to understand this way. After all, the suspects have recruited themselves, and they can still make mistakes. But unwilling to have a flat plot, the screenwriter who has no control has to make a turning point. Forcibly gave the presiding police an "inspiration". The policewoman felt that her confession was wrong. That's right, the whole plot has become. I'm not satisfied with the story you made up earlier, so you can make up another one. Okay, the suspect as the lead actor is back again, and this time a new story is remade, which is very similar to the previous one. But replaced the actual offender with a younger sister. Hey, you guessed it, the police believed it again. Therefore, the similar stories of two different criminal subjects are all under the circumstances that the police do not actively verify the clues and do not actively outline their own reasoning. The touching affection is just inexplicably justified. I can’t help but want to make up the third story, the fourth story, and the nth story for the suspect in this episode. Listen well, the third story is a "moving story" about the two sisters who were forced to go to bed together by a man and forced to go to bed together. In the fourth story, the man finds that he is running out of time, he deliberately violently treats the woman, and cleverly arranges for his sister to poison himself, which is actually a "tragic story" of poisoning himself. I can also make up the nth story. As long as you change the subject of the crime a little bit and tell it as a story, the police will take the initiative to believe you inexplicably. My story can be arranged speciously according to screenwriter standards. You can arrange two, why can't you arrange 3, 10, n. A specific analysis, the logical dead point of the second episode. First, the previous story of the female criminal suspect was told while being frightened by the police. When the police called her back, they discovered that at first they were scaring you to confess. The female criminal suspect still regards the policewoman who lied to you to confess to imprisonment as a close friend, and she kept telling the next story. Second, according to the logic of the screenwriter, the first story is false, and the second is true. Then when the police heard the first story, but did not ask any questions, then you know that the police were scaring you at first. When I was still coming back, I was surprised to find that I was lying to you? ? ? Third, the logic of the screenwriter is that the second story is true, which means that the goal is to convict the sister. Then the suspect also took the initiative to tell a second story to expose that he was actually committing the crime to his sister. Isn't that against your own purpose? ? Obviously the second story cannot be easily told by the suspect. It is only logical to rely on the police to constantly find clues to force the suspect to say his intentions. Fourth, if the criminal suspect voluntarily speaks out his intentions, it means that he is not in order to commit the crime to his sister, he does not need to make up the first story of his own murder, and if there is no first story, he does not need to confide his intentions. Ah's second story. In summary, the logic is linked to each other, and my own story has killed my own story structure. Such a torture story constructed by contradictory logic, laughed out loud. In fact, the whole story structure is there, and the point of expression is barely above it. However, it is necessary to seek to subtract evidence search, clue search and other necessary police work, deliberately emphasize that after subtraction, only pay attention to the "simple and simple" handling of cases in torture. As a result, torture has become a nonsense story that only listens to criminals' constant bragging, and only relying on warmth and lies to persuade the torture police. So, the second episode is a shit story with a barely existing story frame, but logically unreasonable. Okay, it's the third episode. In the third episode, the story is reasonably reasonable, but it does not show the police officers a little bit of brilliance and uses the so-called safeguarding of human rights to attack the Three Views, the police's ethics, and the law and morals. The third episode probably tells such a story. The police arrested a driver who was suspected of driving a black truck. The driver just picked up the car, but didn't know what to transport, so he drove according to the instructions. When caught, the truck should have been abandoned, and the car and the driver had already been separated. There may be poor immigrants crossing the border illegally on the truck. The weather was extremely cold, and the migrants were locked in trucks that were not kept warm. If you don't know the location, the rescue will probably freeze to death. There are not many problems with the plot of this episode. But the police are really wasteful. Because the truck driver didn’t know about it, he refused to confess where he left the car, because a confession is to admit that he knew about it, and once it was an immigrant, whether it was smuggling of immigrants or indirectly causing immigrants to freeze to death, once he admitted to knowing , Basically a very long prison sentence or even the death penalty. But the police's approach is too useless. First of all, the criminal suspect’s psychological defense was not broken through torture, but instead prompted the suspect to hire a lawyer. The truck driver was worried about his life and refused to explain it. The police were unable to obtain information. In fact, the police can promise massive reductions or even exemptions to obtain information about trucks that may have immigrants. In the West, there are plea bargaining, and the police have a certain degree of authority to reduce the sentence. A good deal for a criminal suspect will definitely have a bad effect. But you can’t break through the suspect and are eager to get the location of the truck. What kind of scene is it? It's just that the police are useless, stubborn, face-saving, and want good results. Dream it. Of course, these are the daily pressures the police suffer. It is very possible to do a poor job under pressure, although it is indeed not handled well. But it is also understandable. After all, this is how the police work. I tried my best, and I didn't do a good job and there was no big problem of principle. It is to learn more and do better in the future, and strive to deal with it better next time. Although this kind of plot is not prominent, it has principles and positive energy. But what happened in the plot? The police in charge of the trial took the initiative to drink high-concentration alcohol during the interrogation. This time, the plot was blown up, and the audience's three views were blown up. Taking the initiative to drink in the formal interrogation procedures under the legal procedures has tarnished the legitimacy of the procedures, violated the rules and conduct of the police, and violated the law and order. The expulsion is certain, and the prison meal is almost certain. And ironically, neither the policemen who depended on interrogation for food in a room nor the experienced senior police officers found out whether the colleague in charge of the interrogation was interrogated while drinking, or was discovered by an opposing lawyer who was not a policeman. This is logically unreasonable. In order to form a strong contrast, the screenwriter repeatedly breaks the boundaries of logic. You break through once or twice to show the beauty of humanity or other aspects. Can. But the screenwriter is repeatedly breaking through the boundaries of logic. It's not a trivial matter, it's a breakthrough in the general direction. It broke through the basic line of criminal investigation and interrogation, that is, steadfast police work. Finally, the top officer of the interrogation team, knowing that the chief investigator was drinking, made a desperate bet. He still agreed and asked the chief investigator who violated the basic rules and laws of the police station to go to the trial. This kind of behavior is called knowing the law and breaking the law, making mistakes again and again. Originally, because he did not find that the trial officer's illegal behavior of drinking and interrogating was guilty of unforgivable direct leadership weakness, he indirectly condoned the violation, and continued to allow the police officer who had previously broken the law to commit the crime under his own orders. The disregard for the law is surprising. What to do at this time. Immediately dismiss the police officer in charge and no longer participate in any police work. And the team leader took the initiative to give the criminal suspect the condition of exemption from punishment (this time because the police officer in charge of the trial violated the law and has violated the procedural legitimacy, it is impossible to convict the criminal suspect). Condemned by one's own conscience. Police officers will basically get information about the truck if they put pressure on them or plead with the suspect. At this point, it is completely unnecessary for the screenwriter to arrange for the offending police officer to be interrogated again. It will only increase one's own guilt. So, the third story is barely reasonable. But the following series of plots of illegal operations are displayed. Not only was the plot worsened to the extreme, it also caused an impact on the legitimate police conduct and inviolable law and order. There is even no need to attack, but it still goes against the logic to attack for the impact. The first three episodes were so bad. The headline is the interrogation room again, indicating that there is no display of evidence collection and processing, witnesses search for inquiries, police detectives trace clues themselves to form their own theories and a lot of police work, only deliberately for subtraction to show the ultimate "simple simplicity" Torture. This represents a fatal problem with the text of the play. Abandoning the drama is a matter of course. Of course, those who don't have high demands on the basic logic and plot, just want to appreciate the actors' acting skills. It can be seen as an entertainment pastime. Finally, the top officer of the interrogation team, knowing that the chief investigator was drinking, made a desperate bet. He still agreed and asked the chief investigator who violated the basic rules and laws of the police station to go to the trial. This kind of behavior is called knowing the law and breaking the law, making mistakes again and again. Originally, because he did not find that the trial officer's illegal behavior of drinking and interrogating was guilty of unforgivable direct leadership weakness, he indirectly condoned the violation, and continued to allow the police officer who had previously broken the law to commit the crime under his own orders. The disregard for the law is surprising. What to do at this time. Immediately dismiss the police officer in charge and no longer participate in any police work. And the team leader took the initiative to give the criminal suspect the condition of exemption from punishment (this time because the police officer in charge of the trial violated the law and has violated the procedural legitimacy, it is impossible to convict the criminal suspect). Condemned by one's own conscience. Police officers will basically get information about the truck if they put pressure on them or plead with the suspect. At this point, it is completely unnecessary for the screenwriter to arrange for the offending police officer to be interrogated again. It will only increase one's own guilt. So, the third story is barely reasonable. But the following series of plots of illegal operations are displayed. Not only was the plot worsened to the extreme, it also caused an impact on the legitimate police conduct and inviolable law and order. There is even no need to attack, but it still goes against the logic to attack for the impact. The first three episodes were so bad. The headline is the interrogation room again, indicating that there is no display of evidence collection and processing, witnesses search for inquiries, police detectives trace clues themselves to form their own theories and a lot of police work, only deliberately for subtraction to show the ultimate "simple simplicity" Torture. This represents a fatal problem with the text of the play. Abandoning the drama is a matter of course. Of course, those who don't have high demands on the basic logic and plot, just want to appreciate the actors' acting skills. It can be seen as an entertainment pastime. Finally, the top officer of the interrogation team, knowing that the chief investigator was drinking, made a desperate bet. He still agreed and asked the chief investigator who violated the basic rules and laws of the police station to go to the trial. This kind of behavior is called knowing the law and breaking the law, making mistakes again and again. Originally, because he did not find that the trial officer's illegal behavior of drinking and interrogating was guilty of unforgivable direct leadership weakness, he indirectly condoned the violation, and continued to allow the police officer who had previously broken the law to commit the crime under his own orders. The disregard for the law is surprising. What to do at this time. Immediately dismiss the police officer in charge and no longer participate in any police work. And the team leader took the initiative to give the criminal suspect the condition of exemption from punishment (this time because the police officer in charge of the trial violated the law and has violated the procedural legitimacy, it is impossible to convict the criminal suspect). Condemned by one's own conscience. Police officers will basically get information about the truck if they put pressure on them or plead with the suspect. At this point, it is completely unnecessary for the screenwriter to arrange for the offending police officer to be interrogated again. It will only increase one's own guilt. So, the third story is barely reasonable. But the following series of plots of illegal operations are displayed. Not only was the plot worsened to the extreme, it also caused an impact on the legitimate police conduct and inviolable law and order. There is even no need to attack, but it still goes against the logic to attack for the impact. The first three episodes were so bad. The headline is the interrogation room again, indicating that there is no display of evidence collection and processing, witnesses search for inquiries, police detectives trace clues themselves to form their own theories and a lot of police work, only deliberately for subtraction to show the ultimate "simple simplicity" Torture. This represents a fatal problem with the text of the play. Abandoning the drama is a matter of course. Of course, those who don't have high demands on the basic logic and plot, just want to appreciate the actors' acting skills. It can be seen as an entertainment pastime. What to do at this time. Immediately dismiss the police officer in charge and no longer participate in any police work. And the team leader took the initiative to give the criminal suspect the condition of exemption from punishment (this time because the police officer in charge of the trial violated the law and has violated the procedural legitimacy, it is impossible to convict the criminal suspect). Condemned by one's own conscience. Police officers will basically get information about the truck if they put pressure on them or plead with the suspect. At this point, it is completely unnecessary for the screenwriter to arrange for the offending police officer to be interrogated again. It will only increase one's own guilt. So, the third story is barely reasonable. But the following series of plots of illegal operations are displayed. Not only was the plot worsened to the extreme, it also caused an impact on the legitimate police conduct and inviolable law and order. There is even no need to attack, but it still goes against the logic to attack for the impact. The first three episodes were so bad. The headline is the interrogation room again, indicating that there is no display of evidence collection and processing, witnesses search for inquiries, police detectives trace clues themselves to form their own theories and a lot of police work, only deliberately for subtraction to show the ultimate "simple simplicity" Torture. This represents a fatal problem with the text of the play. Abandoning the drama is a matter of course. Of course, those who don't have high demands on the basic logic and plot, just want to appreciate the actors' acting skills. It can be seen as an entertainment pastime. What to do at this time. Immediately dismiss the police officer in charge and no longer participate in any police work. And the team leader took the initiative to give the criminal suspect the condition of exemption from punishment (this time because the police officer in charge of the trial violated the law and has violated the procedural legitimacy, it is impossible to convict the criminal suspect). Condemned by one's own conscience. Police officers will basically get information about the truck if they put pressure on them or plead with the suspect. At this point, it is completely unnecessary for the screenwriter to arrange for the offending police officer to be interrogated again. It will only increase one's own guilt. So, the third story is barely reasonable. But the following series of plots of illegal operations are displayed. Not only was the plot worsened to the extreme, it also caused an impact on the legitimate police conduct and inviolable law and order. There is even no need to attack, but it still goes against the logic to attack for the impact. The first three episodes were so bad. The headline is the interrogation room again, indicating that there is no display of evidence collection and processing, witnesses search for inquiries, police detectives trace clues themselves to form their own theories and a lot of police work, only deliberately for subtraction to show the ultimate "simple simplicity" Torture. This represents a fatal problem with the text of the play. Abandoning the drama is a matter of course. Of course, those who don't have high demands on the basic logic and plot, just want to appreciate the actors' acting skills. It can be seen as an entertainment pastime.
View more about Criminal: UK reviews
