The basic story is not bad. As a political comedy, the reverse twist is completely unexpected to the individual. At the end, the residents of the small town gathered together to talk about the dialogue and the thinking displayed was very personal. The wording and sentence formation of the lines was still in the same style of Situ style, and it could be seamlessly connected to his daily talk show in the next second. (I almost thought that after the two uncles finished talking, they would cut out the picture. The 囧 Situ, who switched to a suit and tie, sat in the studio and started teasing. As a result, the expected stubbornness did not happen, so I still want to take it seriously. Really make a movie)
At the end, the name of the movie matched the scrolling picture of the money printing machine and the inscription "money lives happy ever after" began to fade in. The crimson irresistible blends with the black background, and the word “resist” is highlighted in white, which inevitably makes people think deeply as a warning. The mini-comedy episodes in the middle of the end of the film are crazy to export private goods. As a burden, the degree of completion is very high, and the topics that should be thought of are all clicked. Worthy of being a talk show host for many years, he still has a solid foundation in comedy. As a veteran TV media person, Ji Situ took the lead in reflecting on the American political news environment, and the accusations and contradictions that he grasped hit the nail on the head. I can’t help but feel that the way of thinking behind this discussion of the fourth right comes from that few years ago, when I straddled my face at the hearing and looked melancholy and exhausted, I kept calling for the firefighters who suffered from cancer due to 9/11. , I can’t wait to use love to influence the House and call on the old white-haired leftist white man to make money.
But aside from my increasingly bizarre uncle’s fantasy, in fact, what I appreciate more in the film is that as a producer, he did not let his expressiveness infringe on the integrity of the previous story, nor did he try to show off how smart he is. It wasn't until the beginning, the succession, and the transition were all performed, that the small fragments in the middle of the report were used for independent output. Strictly speaking, the movie story is not much brilliant, and this little technique is not very clever. However, this restraint and respect for the main body of the story have allowed me to write openly, and I can at least blow 10,000 characters.
The last interview fragment that appeared was also very interesting for the discussion of the American electoral economy. (Yes, there are so many private goods at the end of this film. Compared with its information, the political comedy that was nearly an hour and a half before is very boring. The whole story is not worth mentioning except for the turning point. Probably the reason is to blame me. It’s not easy to be pleased by this kind of comedy. The laughter has been together with Sansu shit for so many years, and it hasn’t grown much, nor can it be advanced. Seriously, most of the laughter and irony in this story are structured. It’s commonplace in political comedies. There are not many highlights and new ideas are rare. It can only be regarded as the average level in satirical comedy, ordinary and straightforward black humor. This is not bad, at least it can show the book when compared with Situ himself. It’s simple, unrestrained, and forbearing, and after a little bit, it can be said that the director, Dazhi, is as foolish as he is light.)
Stop complaining, and come back to discuss the interview. I asked the former chairman of the Federal Election Commission to point out that there are problems with the hundreds of millions of election funds that are difficult to trace and difficult to monitor in the U.S. four-year torn show. It feels like the producer wants to highlight the fairy tale comedy after going around such a big circle. The main topic. Although the last sentence in the film is that the interviewer is saying "it's very helpful", as a pessimist, I still believe that the changes that such a film can make may be limited. After all, submerged in the developed American film and television industry and entertainment industry, there are only so many splashes that a movie can arouse. Surrounded by endless nipple music, this particular form of white left movies will inevitably be labeled as political propaganda. The audience that can be attracted is still a bit too limited.
View more about Irresistible reviews
