When talking about the movies in the first four days of D-Day, the angle is indeed relatively rare. It is the first time I know that Eisenhower and Yau have had such a big conflict. The obstacle to the implementation of Overlord Operation is not only the weather. However, the movie has weakened the details of Yau. Going to a beach to see the soldiers' bloody war hit the fourth year and began to feel distressed for lives? Is this still the belligerent bulldog that said "We shall fight on the beaches." in the inaugural speech? I always feel that this is too convincing. . So I doubt the authenticity of part of the plot... and did Yau really give the final speech? Workaholics running around four days before D-Day? Back to Kent to paint right after landing? How distrustful of the Americans in the front, you can suddenly let go of it?
The whole movie is too drama, and the actors used too much force (here, let’s talk about it, this version of Yau looks really similar, except for Qiao Liu, I think it’s all okay, but the accent is obviously not hard for a dog, and the speech is so clear and unscientific. Qiao Liukasi is too perfunctory! Chu Na is so dumb, stuttering is not an accent heavier than kimchi! The scene is not clear, who can tell that he is the king at first!) I thought Shah in the line of Qiu's prayer. The drama is on the scene... The rhythm is too fast, and "The Darkest Hour" obviously tells a few days of stories, but this one is the same as the running account, and there is no focus. The distribution of the drama conflicts is very general. Compared to the stories of Yau and British politicians, and the stories of allied military generals, which are often photographed, it is true that Yau speaks so heavily to the Americans. . . .
Arrived. . .
View more about Churchill reviews
