When I watched it at the time, I thought that I would start from the direction of silence from the title and look at his jealousy of Bruce Wayne, but the final outcome was too disappointing.
Also disappointed is the overall outline of the plot. As a representative of the DC villain's high IQ, the riddler turned out to be holding a sniper rifle for the first time. I thought it was a dead shot. . . And I basically didn't bring out the characteristics of the Riddler in the later, which led to my first reaction when the final ending told me that silence is actually the Riddler. . . wtf? I like reversal plots, but why is such a reversal so wrong? Can't figure out what the screenwriter thinks.
I have watched two Batman animated movies recently. In addition to this one, "Batman: Gotham Under the Gas Lamp", there is such a problem. The first half gives you a suspenseful atmosphere, but it is difficult to reveal the answer. Convincing. The most important thing is that motives conflict with the most basic people. There is not much to expand the profile of the villain. It may be limited by the length of time, but I don't understand why so many emotional dramas are added, which makes the insufficient length of the plot even more bloated. It also gives some viewing experience a sense of fragmentation.
View more about Batman: Hush reviews
