The whole film has a clear logic and a lot of foreshadowing, so what happens later is dramatic but reasonable, and I like it better. Unfortunately, there are fewer reversals, not enough suspense, and the degree of excitement is greatly reduced. It's quite satisfactory, it doesn't count in any aspect, and it makes people unable to fault.
Summary of the story:
A group of robbers conspired to steal the bank vault, so they chose the man’s house next door as the location of the crime, digging a tunnel directly to the bottom of the vault. In order not to expose before committing the crime, arrange for the female protagonist to stay in the man’s house (the house just happened to have a vacant room for rent) to monitor the man. The Lord’s behavior, everyone knows that the male lead is a technical house, and his psychological quality is surprisingly good. He soon discovered their plan and decided to take a share of it to improve his life. The love-hate entanglement between the Lords finally cracked down on crime and returned the beautiful woman he embraced.
The pre-laying is slightly procrastinated
The whole film took nearly an hour to do the preliminary laying, just to make the fight between the hero and the robbers more reasonable, the details of the control, to portray the characters, to bury a lot of foreshadowings, and to show the inside of the criminal gang. The disunity, from the beginning because of the cell phone killing an accomplice, the conversation between the two tunnels, the left-hander lost his watch, when stealing money, subconsciously aiming at the accomplice and some subtle camera expressions. These plots make the rhythm of the entire film become very slow, sacrifice the degree of excitement, and the logic is even more brilliant.
The conversations between mother and son at the beginning, scattered books, the male protagonist repairing machines, and the trophy in the basement were all set up for Joaquin’s academic masters, and also showed the male protagonist’s lonely life, which was made for the dependent female protagonist’s mother and daughter. Good foreshadowing. A lot of stories are also used to inform the audience about the love between the hero and the heroine and the rationality of the heroine's rebellion.
Overall relatively plain
The climax was mainly when I started stealing the bank. It felt very comfortable to watch the details I noticed in the early stage play a role here, but the plot itself was relatively plain. It’s as if the screenwriter had planned everything in the early stage, and the subsequent plots were taken for granted. The overall plot is too straightforward, there is no suspense, there is no reversal, and it affects the perception too.
The following is a detailed inventory of my own sorting out, including spoilers, it is recommended to discuss after watching the movie
Spoilers included
Spoilers included
Spoilers included
Spoilers included
Have you figured it out?
Question: Why did the robbers choose to commit the crime next door to the male protagonist's house?
Answer: The introduction to the story is the introduction of the bank, the male lead’s house, and the geographical distribution of the house selected by the robbers.
Question: Why does the sheriff eat cookies.
Answer: The sheriff has hypoglycemia, 1 hour and 36 minutes, it is prompted in the film.
Question: At the end , why did the sheriff get into a trance after eating biscuits and cause a car accident.
Answer: In the beginning, the protagonist made homemade biscuits for the euthanasia of the dog, and the sheriff ate it.
Question: Why is the wall so easy to go through
Answer: The lens has been given a close-up, the wall is a brick wall, not concrete
Q: Why do men monitor the next room?
Answer: One is because you have to avoid yourself because you are curious about what you are going to do next, two because you may feel familiar when you hear the voice of the heroine, and the third is because the heroine said that the voice next door is the sound of the elevator, which makes the hero curious.
Question: Why did the little girl not speak for two years
Answer: Because the heroine boyfriend is a pedophile and asks the little girl to provide services, she is forced to not talk to anyone.
Question: Why do little girls wear only underwear and underwear to the master’s room
Answer: Because it is usually used to provide sexual services for the boyfriend of the heroine, in his opinion, his mother seems to have changed a boyfriend, so she also came to provide services.
Question: Why does the male lead tie a microphone to the dog?
Answer: Because I saw the girl talking with the dog, I was curious about what they were saying. The microphone was added afterwards, not at the beginning.
Question: Why is the heroine so easily instigated
Answer: The male protagonist has been dividing the relationship between her and the other party. From showing him the video to listening to the girl's voice, it is really scheming to disintegrate the other party's image of a good person in the heart of the heroine.
Question: Why do men mainly blow up water pipes
Answer: The protagonist promised that the protagonist would wipe out the robbers. Be punished in order to fulfill the promise to the heroine
Question: Why is it so easy for the male lead to go through the vault?
Answer: Because the hole dug by the robbers only kept the thickness of the vault 10cm, the vault was laid with floor tiles, and bombs were only used to save time and save trouble.
Question: Why does the male protagonist steal money not trigger the alarm
Answer: Because the notes have been made during the monitoring process
Question: Why did the police and the bank not respond at all during the crime?
Answer: Because there was a sergeant insider who dismissed all relevant personnel
Question: What's in the 155 cabinet
Answer: The 155 cabinet is some information released by the sheriff. Avoid cabinets with alarms.
Question: Why are robbers so easily instigated
Answer: A lot of foreshadowing suggests the mistrust between the robbers. The most important thing is that the little girl stole the "left-handed" watch in the past.
Question: Why did the sheriff not kill the male lead in the end?
Answer: The sheriff has never really killed anyone. He has been asking for money and helping the robbers deal with the aftermath.
The final ending is somewhat dramatic and heartwarming. The bad guys are all over, and the good guys live a happy life.
View more about At the End of the Tunnel reviews
