In the movie, as the plot slowly opened up, the suspense was concentrated in the "basement". There is a series of shots in the basement, which is very good to take the audience to the thinking "forked road" that the director wants the audience to walk into.
But this is a series of shots with no logic and no motivation, unreasonable, and a lot more. It's just the director's sophistry shot. He is not like the plot of the old man firing the last shot, the narration of the black policeman in the confession footage before the first flash, and the kid behind him entering the old man’s house with a gun. All these are logical and reasonable plot explanations.
Basically, the movie is pretty good. Judging from the movie's name "Good Neighbor", the continuous flashing of the camera, and the plot before the movie, the director has always created a kind of illusion that the lonely old man who does not communicate with others is hidden. What are you holding?
The voyeuristic scenes, the "ghosts" created by two young people, all these suspenseful and horrifying effects make the audience deeply guided. Some people can't help but think of Hitchcock's rear window, "In order to kill time, a photojournalist watched his neighbors and peeped at their daily lives, and from this he saw through the story of a murderous wife and corpse in an elderly room. Unexplained noise", a similar feeling.
The sudden music and the abnormality of the door, a kind of peeping and manipulating God’s pleasure permeated it, and people can’t help but speculate that the next plot may be that two young people discovered a "traumatic" murder case, and then the incident Reach the climax part. It's a pity that the audience was deceived by the director.
View more about The Good Neighbor reviews
