For a long time, I have always liked watching thrillers. This kind of film often shows that an ordinary person solves a difficult situation through his familiar unconventional skills and alternative wisdom in a special environment. Such a story is quite interesting to think about. This film In this field, works are above the passing line.
This film uses a character identity that does not often appear in thrillers-a thief. When a thief steals a perverted killer's house, what will happen? It’s interesting to think about it. The director seems to think a lot in this part of the opening plot. He is also extremely successful in shaping the murderer. He is violent, but he is also meticulous. He is one step ahead of the protagonist in all aspects. Watching the protagonist comeback in adversity, it’s a pity that the next plot director and screenwriter seem to collapse. Maybe it’s because the villain has always been so strong, the protagonist has no hope of winning, or the villain is a neurotic. No matter what the reason is, the villain is in the second half of the plot. Suddenly bear children in possession: stealing things, spreading rumors, sending nude photos, planting and framing...After doing a series of bearish things one after another, they suddenly became inexplicably violent again, and completely lost their IQ and logic. At this point, I can bear it, but the protagonist has lost his IQ. The smart little details such as camera screenshots, navigation records, and mobile phone photography will be completely brain-deficient and directly staged. It's like a textbook: if you don't save someone, you get fucked. This makes people really powerless to complain.
Regardless of the plot, the horror and tension in the first half of the film are still very good. I can feel a little shadow of "Rear Window" in the scene of sneaking into the house, and the little thief and The contest of little wisdom between the villains is also quite interesting, but unfortunately this part was not inherited at the end of the film, giving people the illusion of a director who changed the screenwriter halfway. Fortunately, the details are rich enough and every point is also given. Give an explanation as much as possible. No matter whether it is really reasonable or not, the director and screenwriter have considered it and gave an explanation. This is higher than most crime thrillers of the same type. If the director and screenwriter can continue to enter this field, they will definitely take it. There should be better works coming down, 3 and a half stars overall. Due to the sincerity in the details, I can barely give 4 stars.
View more about Bad Samaritan reviews