In the latter part of the story, the good and evil sides face each other and are surprised at each other's actions. Why would a little thief go to save a girl he never knew, regardless of the safety of his life? Why does a rich kid want to play other people's lives as a game, which is not cruel and exciting enough? The confrontation between the two sides was destined to be unequal and brutal at the beginning. The little thief has no resources, can't play with the brains of the rich man, and can't withstand the storm-like attacks that subvert his group. However, the little hairy thief must spare everything he wants to save the mutilated and kidnapped girl, and must avenge the evil "riches". The rich man believes that he has full control of the whole game. His huge wealth, his smartness and meticulousness, and his gaming chips do not allow him to doubt himself. The actual police force and law enforcement force are affected and restrained by many factors, which have added more tilt to the unequal fighting between the two sides. It seems that one can only rely on fate and luck to save the war. In the end, the rescued and rescued men and women unite to subdue the alternative "Batman" who is both rich and powerful and evil only accidentally and carelessly. The little thief defeated the big evil. After watching the movie, I felt that the real world in the West seemed to be guarding against small thieves and protecting the big evil. One is fighting hard at the risk of life, and the other is using wealth and power in the game. If it weren't for the heroic righteousness of a thief, how could one tear away the integrity of the rich and powerful and get a glimpse of the bones piled up by demons.
WeChat rrxhrrxh public account mzyq2018/Mengzhiyunqu
View more about Bad Samaritan reviews
