Feeling: The movie is a good movie, but I always feel that the filming is too flat and straightforward, and some of the shots are also very strange.
After watching "Lord of the Flies", the sense of disobedience when watching "A Good Show" found the reason. I think it's just three words, I didn't dare to shoot (Of course, it might not pass the deeper level that Huang Bo didn't dare to shoot. The humanity, the distortion of despair, this "lord of the flies" confronts the darkness directly, and unobtrusively expresses the "a good show" like breadth first, family love, leadership of subordinates, the protagonist is an adult, with The intricate social relationships also give birth to the subsequent stories. Every aspect seems to be involved, but if you don’t go deep into "Lord of the Flies", depth is the priority. Imperfect stories are also more realistic and thought-provoking. But depth and viewing experience are two different things. I really feel that Lord of the Flies is somewhat inexplicable...Is it a problem of different ages? The whole film was once given. I have the illusion of watching a documentary, the narrative is also very flat, the first two thirds basically have no climax. From the point of view of the movie experience, I prefer "A Good Show", the tone of black humor is stronger, and the good ending is also satisfied. The expectations of the audience. But compared with the two, "Lord of the Flies" is the movie that can be remembered for a long time.
View more about Lord of the Flies reviews
