They didn't kill the boys

Sydnie 2022-08-15 22:13:40

Reading existing film reviews, I found that many people did not notice this: when cleaning the scene, he found a bullet in the tree. There was a shot. He also deliberately touched the back of the boy's head. It was very clean and there was no blood. But then he insisted on using a knife to open the boy's head wound, and told his friend that it was to take out the bullet from the head, eliminate the evidence, and protect the friend. Why did he lie? There is only one reason: they didn't kill the boy. The first shot was actually missed and hit in the tree, but he actually killed the boy's uncle. In order to kidnap his friend mentally, he took out the bullet from the boy’s head that did not belong to him, making the boy’s death a death certificate that could not be found out. At the same time, he let his friend completely bear the guilt of murder in order to protect him. The secret of his actual murder. This time, for his own sake, he put his weak friend in an indeemable position; but at the end, his friend killed him with another shot for his own survival. The two examples mutually confirm the gloominess of human nature.

View more about Calibre reviews