It is difficult for biopics not to be labeled as "keeping a running account". Unfortunately, this movie is not immune. It records the life of the legendary drug lord Escobar, which is not ugly. The selected key stories are quite memorable after reading them. For example, when the police used multiple helicopters to attack his camp, he escaped naked. At the very moment, I have not forgotten to tell my crew to open the pigeon cage to release the pigeons-flocks of pigeons flew into the sky, hit the helicopter, got caught in the propeller, and caused the helicopter to crash (the poor man’s "fighting plane" coup~); The wife was intercepted by her enemy at the bank. She thought her death was over and she collapsed on the ground and wept bitterly. However, the glass was bulletproof. She smashed her opponent with a hammer and shot with a submachine gun to no avail (the bank staff previously refused to call the police and pulled down the inner layer Tiemen), and finally left... Similar legendary plots in the film are not uncommon, but they are very messy and disorderly when connected together. The creation of characters through events makes it difficult for movies to become masterpieces. The reason is that although the small plot of the film is rich, it is connected in the plot, and the characters grow and change partly in the progress of the plot. They did not give their own logic, presentation and answers to the comparison between before and after.
A biopic, the characters are pale, the contrast between before and after is thin, and the protagonist is still bloody. Not ugly, but powerless to become a masterpiece.
View more about Loving Pablo reviews
