1. Don't be silent
How terrible is silence? I often feel this way. If I don’t chat about a few words in my circle of friends for a few days, which seems to be perverse, rebellious, incomprehensible and inexplicable in the eyes of ordinary people, I feel like I’m dead, and Kadir’s words don’t exist. The words are right at all: I think, therefore I am
But I never think about everyone’s feelings when I speak. I can’t make everyone think about it. If I keep silent for the sake of one’s feelings, the other ninety-nine people don’t know what I think. , Then I'd rather pick up a stick and beat that person severely. Why don't you let me talk?
So I’m a venomous tongue in my circle of friends, so people often say that I’m immature, impulsive, and ill-considered, but they don’t know that I have been resisting the secular in this society. If maturity means giving up resistance to the secular and accepting the secular. The law and the integration into the secular, for me, is tantamount to betraying myself, so there is no need to mature, you can let mature to eat shit I don’t know what to do with immediate interests or the realization of long-term interests. Yin and Yang are both false and self-contained, opportunistic, bribery, condescension, grievance, and so on. Forget the original words, it probably means: science (materialism) has changed the world and improved the lives of human beings, but the salvation of human souls still depends on humanities (or literature, which means idealism) 2. "Alpha City" Revelation
Logic and illogical, rational and irrational
, So when humans think, God laughs. Therefore, in human society, anti-logic is anti-science, anti-science is anti-rational, anti-rational is irrational, irrational is that this person is not the right person, or the right person is not a good person, logic is clear and abnormal steps. The channel constituted blocks all the extraneous branches, and the only one that leads to correctness is the only way to be correct. This is the case for programming, and the smart machine that writes programming is also the same. For example, if I love you, loving you is to satisfy the conditions and meet the correctness. As a result, then allow love. But loving you does not meet the conditions and does not meet the correct result. Then you cannot love. It must be forcibly terminated before the result appears. So, how do you define the correct result of love? Is there only one explanation for the correct result of love? What intelligent machine logic can predict the future, know in advance whether the result of love is correct? If we replace love with human beings and put it into logic, ask whether human beings are qualified to exist on the earth? The logic is as follows, if human beings on the earth meet the conditions and meet the correct results, then they are allowed to exist. But the existence of human beings on the earth does not meet the conditions and does not meet the correct result (because humans will build atomic bombs to destroy themselves and destroy the earth), then humans are not qualified to exist on the earth, and must be forcibly terminated before the result appears, and destroy all Humans So, how do you define a person with the correct result? How is the human being with the correct result defined? Is there only one explanation for the correct result for people or human beings? What machine logic can predict the future to know whether the human or human result is correct? If there is really this omniscient and logically powerful machine, before the invention of the atomic bomb, should the ruler put to death Einstein who wrote the mass-energy formula? Or because Einstein's influence was too great, he was found to have his parents executed on an unreasonable crime before he was born, because the mass-energy formula is the foundational theory of the atomic bomb. Then comes the rebuttal, limiting the advancement of science and technology, how did this super machine that can predict the future be developed? Look at this logic, rationality only affirms the present in the ongoing process, denies the past that has occurred, and denies the infinitely possible future, while love is mostly illogical and irrational, and human existence is not determined by logic and rationality. It can be generalized, so the final conclusion I came to is: QNM is mature! QNM's logic! QNM's rationality!
But in the eyes of autocratic rulers, they do not recognize the logic above me. They have their own logic to block and round one by one, and they will offer the "correct" banner. There are ten thousand reasons. Make you believe that the only path he commanded you to take is the right way. They forget: "The essence of human beings is love and faith, courage, warmth, tolerance and sacrifice." It is irrationality that breaks the rules and regulations that make it extraordinary. There will be offshoots if there are offshoots, innovations if there are offshoots, and innovations will enable you to see the diversity of biology and the diversity of life, and everything will have infinite possibilities. Just like the vast universe, it is unimaginable. You can imagine
Moreover, love is undefinable. It is often irrational love that is more tender and lovely. Rational love is like two dead people lying in a coffin, following logical silence. It is definitely boring. I don’t like Baochai because of her. Being too rational because of the stakes, suppressing one's own emotional appeals, going against one's own wishes, being wronged and seeking completeness, and finally being abandoned. Disrespect of oneself is equivalent to being disrespected by another one who is collaborating with others.
There is no logic in the world that is unified, and there is no machine that can contain all logic. I think, like light, only infinitely close to inclusiveness cannot be equal to inclusiveness, and every point of inclusiveness increases tenfold and one hundredfold. The energy consumption of such a machine can only break through the dimension, like transcending the light, only use the wormhole
However, only humans can tolerate everything, because humans are not machines
View more about Alphaville reviews
