As a sequel to Tiger 1, this movie is often compared with "Wolf Warrior 2." To be honest, compared to "Wolf Warrior 2", I prefer "Wolf Warrior 1", at least its narrative structure is complete, the story is very full, while the former is full of play and gunfights, while ignoring the structure and content whole. A film critic once pointed out sharply: "The audience sees "Wolf Warrior 2" not because of its story, but because it exudes patriotic (political) feelings." The same applies to this "The Tiger Is Alive".
I want to point out a few of the bugs first. The story is locked in the Iraqi city of Ikrit. The terrorist ISC took control of this place. But what makes me strange is that there are still people in the terrorist-controlled area who dare to engage in demonstrations. The terrorists did not "fairly" send troops to arrest, but relied on a child to commit suicide. I can only say that this terrorist organization is too "democratic." Up.
In addition, the movie's blackening of the US military is a bit heavy. The heroine acted with the U.S. military. After completing the mission, she said that the heroine had been left behind, causing her to be captured by terrorists. Even if this is the choice of the heroine, it can't just be left alone. I can believe that the US military will make deals with terrorists, but I do not agree with this.
When the female protagonist appeared in the city and told the male lead that Pakistan was also carrying out rescue operations, the male lead angrily shot and killed his subordinates. The boy was tied to bombs and expressed his dissatisfaction and incomprehension towards Pakistan’s intervention. . I have been thinking, these are not theirs. You tell them what they are doing. Can this be a reason for Pakistan to implement illegal rescue? Or do you mean that these are all done by Pakistan? The movie did not give an explanation. In the end, the agents found more than a hundred prisoners during the heavy encirclement, but later they disappeared in the bus driven by the agents. Were they left behind and not rescued or were they rescued by other means? And the terrorists pulled out the prisoners the day before but didn't shoot them, and pushed them back after a speech. Does this make any sense?
I like "Operation Tiger", at least it expresses some themes of India-Pakistan reconciliation, but in this sequel, India and Pakistan completely become the background, the official image of India is too tall, but the Pakistani official collectively lost its voice. Needless to say, the protagonist and the protagonist use one enemy against one hundred, and the protagonist will live forever. In this regard, I can only say that this is an open commercial film full of Indian nationalism.
View more about Tiger Zinda Hai reviews
