Inherit the Wind

Aaliyah 2022-01-12 08:01:27

The strong confrontation between the two movie kings, accepting Darwin’s theory of evolution does not mean blaspheming God, and believing in God does not mean ignoring the laws of nature, but it is ridiculous that fanatics ignore this set and consider teaching the theory of evolution as illegal, but a defender lawyer The paranoia and fall are also embarrassing, everything does not have to be so extreme.

Roslyn 2022-03-14 14:12:26

A movie that is worth thinking about is still the case even after so many years. The dispute between human rights and theocracy is actually far from complete. Such a court debate is just a tribute. The three protagonists in the film represent three points of view. Those who have watched the film carefully do not need to see the end of the film to find that Qusay and March are actually believers, but they have different views on religion, and Kelly is the representative of atheism. Of course, he is not admired by the film. Of course, he did not lash out. Instead, many lines of this character expressed the aspirations of part of the audience. For example, people are not as good as monkeys, and people are already regressing and are about to return to the ocean. The last line of this character is really so emotional, he said to Qu Sai, you will be there, what kind of person you are, who else will defend my right to be alone? The generosity statement in the Qusai film is even louder. The two movie kings are very enjoyable, especially they are still performing in two completely different ways. The wife of March, who has not many roles, also plays very well. Adapted from PS real events, the lineup that premiered on Broadway also includes Paul Mooney.