If other scandals are all right, this buddy raped and abused others, caused the victim to commit depression and finally committed suicide, but also pleaded guilty and had no remorse. In the end, he still wanted to use rape to make a movie to make money? In the end, or should the audience support and endorse his film if it is not objective? ?
Since I am a public account, I still need some social ethics, do you really think that the audience is confused? Give various examples to promote what artists are usually abnormal? Is he really worthy of being compared with Van Gogh?
I think I can guide the public's opinion by being maverick and innovating.
View more about The Birth of a Nation reviews
