1. Criminal tactics are too far-fetched, it is impossible to complete these things within five minutes, and the risk is very high.
2. Many incidents have nothing to do with the case, digging holes without filling them, such as the person pushing the stone.
3. Detective Poirot’s method of interrogation here is also very dislike, as fierce as Batman, making enemies everywhere, and telling his own reasoning without sufficient evidence, not only makes others very angry, but also It is possible to give the murderer the opportunity to destroy the evidence, just like Mouri Kogoro.
4. When reasoning in front of everyone, it’s like giving a class to students.
5. It’s weird that the female murderer went to the lawyer’s room to find a pistol. It happened that the lawyer was not there. It happened that the lawyer put the pistol in the drawer, which happened to be on the top of the thing. It happened that the drawer was still It’s too accidental, and if it were me, I would put the gun in an easy-to-handle but never exposed place
. 6. The evidence is just a gunpowder reaction. I was stunned.
7. The daughter didn't care about her dead mother, and married a man.
8. male killer after his wife died performance too bland, you should spend some shots to show his sorrow
9. crime is not necessary when it comes to what nail polish, direct throw, why get people to find a towel shawl bad .
10. The detective is too confident, and he should talk less before there is conclusive evidence.
Summary: I think this movie is not as good as the Orient Express. No matter the plot, technique, reasoning, character performance of that movie is better than this one, it really gives me A shocked crime, the feeling of a great detective
View more about Death on the Nile reviews