This movie is wonderful, and it is out of the ordinary. The atmosphere of the movie is a relaxed comedy, but after I watched it, I have some uncomfortable thoughts. There is a big gap between the status of the male and female owners, and such love stories are not uncommon. But the story is handled very well. First of all, the roles of the hero and heroine are distinct and unique. The male protagonist is in a superior position but doesn't like Ronghua. He likes to read books and pursues knowledge. He has his own research interests and hobbies, but he is dull and honest. The heroine is a quack girl who is accustomed to being cold and warm and proficient in deception and acting. Secondly, the story of Miao Jae is unexpected. At first, the heroine was like an old hunter spying on the situation of the hero, and the thoughts of the hero and the women around him could be seen in full view; then there was her performance time, the man who "stayed in Amazon for a year" The Lord was so provocative. But soon, the story ushered in the first turning point, the "Jean" fake play was really done. Uh, it should be said that everything is still expected by the experienced audience. And seeing this, audiences like me do have faint worries about their fast-growing feelings, lack of understanding, and too illusory. Sure enough, soon, under the faithful servant's due diligence investigation, the true identity of Gene and her "father" was revealed. This speed is beyond the expectations of the audience. If it is a cliché story, the revelation of identity seems to be nearing the end of the story. However, the story is still progressing, and the cruel truth is unacceptable to the naive male protagonist who has been in Amazon for a year. He did not accept the heroine's explanation. Up to this point, neither the male and female protagonists have done anything wrong. The heroine's behavior is her state of existence, and the male protagonist is not wrong. After all, deception is a fact. They broke up, and the mutual hurt mixed with the true feelings made each other unforgettable. In fact, when they broke up, the plot was no longer what the audience could predict. At this time, a crumpled check re-attracted the audience's attention, and the plot also followed up with waves. The heroine's "vicious" declaration shows that everything is far from over. When the heroine made her debut again, it was already Lady Eve, Miss noble of England. Even under the prompt of the loyal servant, the hero still can't see that Gene and Eve are the same person. Although it is a bit of a joke, the film also gives an explanation. When in love at that time, the eyes are sentimental; when the tide of love fades, the eyes return to normal. But in any case, this seems to show the impossibility of passion and the illusion of emotion. And the male protagonist soon fell in love with Eve, and even the words of the confession were the same, which was shocking. I don't know the intentions of the screenwriter and director, but in the eyes of my audience, the male lead seems to be too frivolous. Of course, it is not impossible to explain. The same appearance may make the hero empathize with Miss Eve, which is mentioned in the end of the film. At this time, Miss Eve's identity appeared to be quite reliable, and at the same time, Miss Eve's demeanor was so good that she easily captured the hero's heart again. After that, I was worried that revenge would become the main line of the plot, but the sudden fast-forward as to the marriage once again made me inexplicable. During the honeymoon journey, the female protagonist in the train carriage teased the male protagonist. The painful and tangled expression of the male protagonist made the audience who knew the truth feel amused. Another thing worth mentioning here is the male protagonist showing tolerance and serious attitude towards marriage. The revenge of the heroine was indeed excessive. The climax of the story occurs when the male protagonist refuses to meet with the female protagonist again, leaves his hometown by boat (ready to go to Amazon?), and meets Jean on the way. Of course, this must be the design of the heroine. In the end, the two kissed tightly, and the film came to an abrupt end. What I want to emphasize is that the male protagonist finally showed sincerity and frankness again. I think this is a very important point to impress the female protagonist and the audience. But one thing makes me puzzled, why the hero suddenly forgives Jean's deception, and obviously he still can't tell the two of them as one. The happy ending was originally vulgar, but after such twists and turns, it was quite comforting. The initiative and good expression of the heroine actually determined the character of the heroine. Another film review mentioned that the film was intended to satirize the nobility or the upper class, probably because my class consciousness was not strong enough, and I didn't see it when I watched the film. Finally, my thoughts are just as the title says, do you know who I am? If you change your identity and environment, your lover can’t tell the difference. Is it because the male protagonist is too dull and has no eyes, or is this the normal state of human society? And how difficult it is to understand each other in such a human world. In fact, the male and female leaders are quite sincere compared to the world. The female protagonist teased the male protagonist wildly, and the male protagonist's painful and tangled expression made the audience who knew the truth feel amused. Another thing worth mentioning here is the male protagonist showing tolerance and serious attitude towards marriage. The revenge of the heroine was indeed excessive. The climax of the story occurs when the male protagonist refuses to meet with the female protagonist again, leaves his hometown by boat (ready to go to Amazon?), and meets Jean on the way. Of course, this must be the design of the heroine. In the end, the two kissed tightly, and the film came to an abrupt end. What I want to emphasize is that the male protagonist finally showed sincerity and frankness again. I think this is a very important point to impress the female protagonist and the audience. But one thing makes me puzzled, why the hero suddenly forgives Jean's deception, and obviously he still can't tell the two of them as one. The happy ending was originally vulgar, but after such twists and turns, it was quite comforting. The initiative and good expression of the heroine actually determined the character of the heroine. Another film review mentioned that the film was intended to satirize the nobility or the upper class, probably because my class consciousness was not strong enough, and I didn't see it when I watched the film. Finally, my thoughts are just as the title says, do you know who I am? If you change your identity and environment, your lover can’t tell the difference. Is it because the male protagonist is too dull and has no eyes, or is this the normal state of human society? And how difficult it is to understand each other in such a human world. In fact, the male and female leaders are quite sincere compared to the world. The female protagonist teased the male protagonist wildly, and the male protagonist's painful and tangled expression made the audience who knew the truth feel amused. Another thing worth mentioning here is the male protagonist showing tolerance and serious attitude towards marriage. The revenge of the heroine was indeed excessive. The climax of the story occurs when the male protagonist refuses to meet with the female protagonist again, leaves his hometown by boat (ready to go to Amazon?), and meets Jean on the way. Of course, this must be the design of the heroine. In the end, the two kissed tightly, and the film came to an abrupt end. What I want to emphasize is that the male protagonist finally showed sincerity and frankness again. I think this is a very important point to impress the female protagonist and the audience. But one thing makes me puzzled, why the hero suddenly forgives Jean's deception, and obviously he still can't tell the two of them as one. The happy ending was originally vulgar, but after such twists and turns, it was quite comforting. The initiative and good expression of the heroine actually determined the character of the heroine. Another film review mentioned that the film was intended to satirize the nobility or the upper class, probably because my class consciousness was not strong enough, and I didn't see it when I watched the film. Finally, my thoughts are just as the title says, do you know who I am? If you change your identity and environment, your lover can’t tell the difference. Is it because the male protagonist is too dull and has no eyes, or is this the normal state of human society? And how difficult it is to understand each other in such a human world. In fact, the male and female leaders are quite sincere compared to the world. Too dumb, with eyes but no beads, or is this the normal state of human society? And how difficult it is to understand each other in such a human world. In fact, the male and female leaders are quite sincere compared to the world. Too dumb, with eyes but no beads, or is this the normal state of human society? And how difficult it is to understand each other in such a human world. In fact, the male and female leaders are quite sincere compared to the world.
View more about The Lady Eve reviews
