I think that the two versions have two sides as one, emphasizing different aspects of this story.
The Coriolanus of Shakespeare is so likable. When watching the movie, he was completely immersed in sympathy for what happened to him. Therefore, he was particularly disgusted with the group of ordinary people who were stirred by selfish guardians in a few words. This is also due to the detailed depiction of the insults Coriolanus suffered when he was exiled from the city, as well as the close-ups of the heads of several people. I want to say that Shakespeare reconsidered that democracy is easy to be manipulated 400 years ago, and it is also a rio bull...
The uncle version of Coriolanus is too fierce, which infinitely magnifies the shortcomings of Kou Liulan's own personality: self-directed, negative emotional intelligence, and proud to fly. All the humiliated parts of the city have been deleted, and the corresponding focus is no longer the theater version of "democracy is shit". In addition, Aufidius did not perform well in the theater version, and could not hold up the position of Coriolanus' mortal enemy.
The difference between the two versions is that Coriolanus's mother is super annoying. It is no exaggeration to say that he died in his mother's hands! Both versions of Coriolanus’s wife have no sense of existence. The theater version’s slightly better result is entirely because of n kisses with Dou Sen...
View more about Coriolanus reviews
