The male protagonist just started accepting the case based on the leadership’s intention to change the view of the middle class. It can be seen that one of the keynotes of Indian judicial investigations is that the social effect is greater than the legal effect (at least it can be interpreted in the language of the picture). Ironically, the results of the final trial run counter to the original intention of the leadership to mention the case under the jurisdiction of CDI, because during the year-long investigation process, the direction of public opinion has also been reversed, ambiguous, and vague (Cong Gang From the beginning of the television debate to the angry man who attacked the doctor at the end), the court ignoring the CDI’s application to withdraw the lawsuit and forcibly sentenced the couple guilty. This is simply the driving force of crime and unfair justice, and it is also the most conventional reflection of the public’s psychological perception and intervention of the case. .
Is it similar to our country?
The film involves the balance between entity and procedural justice. The human rights of criminal suspects, the reflection and supervision of judicial power, the exclusion of illegal evidence, and other issues, and the metaphor of the goddess of justice are also specifically pointed out, which are in stark contrast to the final outcome of the case. Unlike the South Korean film "The Melting Pot", this film does not directly refer to judicial corruption, but focuses on the infighting, inaction, and false judgment of public officials. In the last coordination meeting, two radically opposed investigative teams finally compromised. , Closed the case with revocation of the homicide, but was still persuaded and convicted by the judge, and the result was dumbfounding. It is said that the film is adapted from a real case. If the verdict is true, it is not so much a tragedy as a joke, and the sword of the goddess of justice slashed at the innocent.
Going back to the film itself, the performance of the male protagonist is actually perfect. From his intentions during the investigative stage to the fight against the confucians at the final coordination meeting, he can see his sense of responsibility and professionalism. In fact, law and reason are never isolated. We have seen that the male protagonist has substituted emotions in the process of handling the case. Dissatisfaction with the initial police officers, betrayal of the subordinates, and paranoia about the facts of the case have led to the emergence of blame, torture, and drugs. Inducing confession and other violations of procedures, he finally admitted his own shortcomings, which accorded with what he mentioned in his lecture, seeking the balance between absolute facts and the process of collecting evidence. In the end, he compromised (or understood it) and said that "It is better to release ten criminals than to imprison an innocent person." He pointed out that the most important function of the criminal law is not to fight criminals, but to ensure that innocents are not punished without cause. It is very charming and has three views. You must know how many law students in China have not realized this.
There are a small number of emotional dramas in the film, and there are several complicated case deductions, all of which make the rhythm relatively procrastinated. There is no traditional song and dance, and the emphasis is on exposing social reality. Therefore, the plot setting will be much weaker, which is a flaw. However, the male protagonist finally recovered the divorced lover, and watching the two hours of suffocation, he finally got a little comfort.
Finally, I had to complain about the subtitles group. There were a lot of errors. It is estimated that there is no legal background. The literal translation of some words leads to improper translation or even complete errors that may mislead the audience (agency-economic company? investigate-inspection? charge-sheet-payment sheet?) , But still thank them for their hard work.
View more about Talvar reviews
