beat the hearts of the people . The movie "Talvar" (Talvar 2015) tells a story about solving a crime, but the strange thing is that, except for the fact that the investigation scene is true, all other plots are specious, because either it is self-reported or it is him. Narrated. The same plot, such as the parents of the deceased girl Shruti, has been investigated by different investigators and their performance is completely different. This leads to different investigators choosing different investigation directions and breakthrough points; to solve a case, it is generally necessary to have physical evidence and Personal evidence. The peculiarity of this case is that the original crime scene was completely destroyed. The most effective physical evidence, such as the analysis report of fingerprints, blood marks, DNA samples, etc., was not reflected in the chargesheet. Therefore, the investigation The restoring of the case can only be achieved by "people", and the chain of evidence is only completed by "people's words". In this way, different people will give different interrogation results based on different purposes, and the result of the case must be based on this. Will be restored in different forms. It is precisely because the "person" played a decisive role in this case that this case will have its twists and turns, attracting us to watch the movie to the end; it is also in this "turns and turns" that we discover the destructive effect of the "human heart" and the source of the "guilt", we will I can imagine it.
If "justice" is a kind of "public" need of human nature, and "human heart" is mainly manifested in human "selfish desires", then after watching this film, we seem to be able to conclude that "justice can't beat the human heart". Justice in this film is nothing more than "solving a case" and maintaining the function of the law to protect order, but it is "people's mind" that prevents the process of detecting a case from proceeding normally. There are three groups of people before and after the investigation of this case: the first group is the local police station, the second group is the CDI, and the third group is the CDI+ supervisor.
The first set of investigation conclusions cannot be convinced by the public. In addition to the low quality of the investigators and the lack of effective physical evidence, the parents of the deceased (the doctors in their own clinics) also had their own reasons. Their "performance" induces investigators to focus their investigations on them, leading to an unacceptable ethical paradox: How can parents kill their children? Regarding Shruti’s death, her parents didn’t seem to be sad like ordinary people. At first, I suspected that the actors did not perform well. Later, when the deceased’s mother was interviewed by the deceased’s TV interview, she answered calmly and logically. Not only our audience, but also another TV in the film. The guests on the talk show felt that the deceased’s parents’ behavior was abnormal. When this "abnormal" was noticed by the police, and the chief of the police was ordered to solve the case within a time limit by the head of the police department, the breakthrough point in the investigation was entirely on the parents, we can understand, because the deceased was If you cannot be questioned, then you can only ask the living. In addition, Kanhaiya, the clinic associate, said that his employer (namely the deceased Shruti’s parents, Tandons) had an offensive behavior, and the other deceased’s servant Khempal had an adulterous relationship with Shruti. The police fabricated the case for the Tandons and killed their daughter in order to defend their reputation. And the servant's case. The reason why the police believed the man’s words and did not believe the Tandons’ excuses was entirely because they chose what they wanted to believe: they had judged that the Tandons were guilty, and of course they chose testimony that could prove that judgment, even if it should be. The testimony was not very convincing either. From the process of solving this group of cases, we can see that the destructive effects of people's hearts are: the police officers are very happy to solve the case within a time limit; the police have no "free evidence" of conscience and responsibility.
Because the conclusions of the first group were contrary to social ethics and caused “the entire middle-class society to be shaken” in India, the case was transferred to CDI. The CDI investigation direction is completely different from the first group. Although they found that the guy had a freak with Tandon and chose not to believe his testimony, they also fully confirmed that the Tandons were true, but they believed that the Tandons were completely innocent of the investigation direction. The tendency to succumb to the pressure of public opinion is really hard to say, after all, the case has had a wide range of influence; and the Secretary-General of the Ministry of the Interior also expressed in advance the question of "how can parents kill their own daughter". On the whole, the investigative direction of this group is correct. If it develops normally, their conclusion should be the most justice. However, they illegally implemented Narco tests that can cause people to be in a hypnotic state. The effective physical and personal evidence was obtained, but the new CDI chief abandoned it because of illegal methods. The case was put on hold again. Although there were "human" factors in it, the behavior of Ashwin Kumar, the head of the joint investigation team, was indeed problematic.
Ashwin was called the pride of the police by the Attorney General, and his arrogance is obvious, which made him not to be seen by his new boss, JK, the new head of CDI. First of all, JK coerced Ashwin’s partner Vedant to tamper with the most powerful physical evidence. The pillowcase with blood stains on the deceased was found in the murderer’s room, but it was said that it was found in the deceased’s room, causing the physical evidence to become invalid automatically. , He took again from Vedant the mobile phone video of Ashwin torturing the stutterer who could provide valid testimony, which in turn made him dignifiedly discard the valid testimony. Vedant's betrayal caused Ashwin to be forced to leave CDI. However, for Vedant, this was purely an act of self-preservation, because when Ashwin was at home, a woman named Vaishali should have come to explain the betrayal on behalf of Vedant. JK's sordid behavior in disregard of justice is not only because he is afraid of Ashwin's talents, but also because he wants to help his police friend-Guru, the head of the previous investigation team-save a bit of face, because Guru does invite JK to dinner. The investigation team headed by Ashwin did completely abandon the investigation evidence of the previous group. In this way, the collapse of Ashwin would not make the public think that the previous investigation team was useless; in addition, JK’s behavior also "replied" the old CDI chief The meaning of Rama, because Rama ridiculed his words. Although JK kills three birds with one stone, his main purpose should be to exclude Ashwin. Obviously, from the second set of case-solving process, we find the destructive effect of the human heart: it makes us drift away from the once close justice.
The third group is still led by CDI, but at Vedant’s suggestion, JK agreed to add more inspectors to the investigation group. All of Vedant’s suggestions should be that he does not want to re-establish the direction of the investigation regardless of the facts. He investigated the case with Ashwin in the second group. It is impossible for him not to know that they almost solved the case. Their previous investigation direction was correct. Therefore, he made such a suggestion to share the responsibilities, and the people he recommends are all retired workers at home. Even if the final investigation conclusion is overturned, this will not have much impact on retired people. Moreover, at the last coordination meeting (?) chaired by the Secretary-General, he asked the retiree named Paul to report the results of the investigation. The intention was very obvious. In fact, the third group’s investigation was almost entirely conducted by two retirees, and they fully understood JK’s intention that they could not repeat Ashwin’s mistakes, so their investigation was just a new search for the first group’s conclusions. evidence. Life matters, two retirees who don’t need to bear any responsibilities dare to fabricate evidence in many ways to satisfy the authorities’ intentions just to gain a little bit of personal gain. It is conceivable that the third investigation has finally evolved into A farce.
In the last coordination meeting chaired by the Secretary-General, he actually wanted to mediate the completely opposite investigation results of the second and third groups. After Ashwin realized that the Secretary-General could not fully believe his judgment, he did it for justice. The last time he tried, that is, "It is better to release ten criminals than to imprison an innocent person." The implication is very clear: possible innocent people should be given as much leeway as possible, because if the case is closed according to the third group of investigation conclusions, Then, Dr. Tandon will face hanging. In order to prevent the consequences of being unable to withdraw, at least the Tandons should not be sentenced to death. This coordination meeting has shown us that the human heart can make such a compromise when it comes to matters of vital importance to life and justice. If this compromise is necessary, then sin is inevitable. Of course, the final court trial also let us know that the female judge not only failed to work hard for justice, but knowing that the evidence was insufficient, she forcibly demanded CDI to sue the Tandons with "possibly guilty" charges. This ended. It makes us feel familiar! (Text/Stone
Planting Flowers Friday, December 11, 2015) PS. Thanks to Krist and Grace, a member of the subtitles team of VGames.com, for providing Chinese subtitles!
View more about Talvar reviews
