Secondly, the relationship between the characters in the film is carried out in the way of group interaction, and the relationship between each group is interspersed, which is somewhat complicated, but it does not affect the viewing of the movie. More than four hours of the movie, there are many details, it is difficult to quickly grasp everything, so wait for the good people to analyze.
For me, the most impressive thing is this female university professor. In the first half of the movie, I think she can be called a very "rational" intellectual, while in the second half, I feel that she has gradually become a lunatic until she changes. Into a ghost. A scholar who knows the ghost house best eventually becomes the ghost in the ghost house. This summary makes people feel like a group of intellectuals who specialize in satire. In the end, she was swallowed up by all that she knew, no, she merged with the object of her research.
After watching the movie, I thought of an old question again: Is it necessary to have a sense of awe for the unknown power? You may not be afraid of that particular object when you have the right tools in your hands, but if you have nothing, can you still dare?
In conclusion, the content of the whole movie is like reading a novel. Reminiscence shots appear from time to time. Frankly speaking, I think this method of shooting is not good. There is no problem with writing memories in novels for people to read, but If a movie is interspersed with memories from time to time like a novel, it will weaken the narrative coherence of a movie, causing movie-watching fatigue and inability to concentrate well. The last sentence, slowly appreciate it~~~
View more about Rose Red reviews
