Ca n't help but write a short comment to vomit~ Excluding the male protagonist's "how can you be so handsome" appearance (seeing this evaluation is really siao) and the female protagonist's sometimes good-looking and sometimes ugly appearance, let's talk about other things.
I really like the color of the film, the warm yellow of the male protagonist city and the white of the female protagonist city, especially the male protagonist is backlit, and a large area of sunlight is shining behind. The parallel montage of the two intertwined in the first half is also very good, and a kind of common connection can be found. The development of the story to the middle part is also acceptable.
But in the second half, when the male protagonist and the female protagonist masturbated remotely on their respective beds, the "framework split" began. The filming of this scene is also very beautiful, just not very explicit, as ambiguous as the plot, but then I think about it. It's a naked mental derailment, and that's fine. According to common sense, shouldn't the heroine be shown the inner struggle, but seeing the heroine's humble appearance, immediately can't bring up the sexual interest (interest).
In 80 minutes, the male protagonist had a remote conversation on the windowsill and the female protagonist in the snow. The montage was also done well. It felt like there was no violation and it was really like a conversation upstairs and downstairs. The difference between the two worlds was reflected through the color difference on both sides. At this time, the heroine finally realized that it was not good for her to cheat, and persuaded the hero to forget that she never contacted each other, but what she said was like "You have been so deeply integrated into my soul", and "I can't Forget you, everything about you", the male lead asked how do you know that I could forget you, the female lead answered "because you love me" like this, are you kidding me? Since you are going to be separated, you are so blatantly "flirting" , Do you have to express your dissatisfaction like this?
Kneeling at the end, without any precaution, the heroine was confined by her husband, and then the hero went to find the heroine, and finally saw each other on the train. This turning point is too abrupt, and it is simply to reverse the plot series for the protagonist's complete panic! In the end, the photography and soundtrack of the train were great. When I was immersed in the picture, I was struggling to think of the plot of dog blood at the same time.
After watching it, I felt so strange. The filming was very literary. Why did a story that could have been literary and literary become such a blockbuster. Later, I saw that the screenwriter was Jos Weiden who understood it instantly and let Marvel’s partner express it. It's no wonder that a film that moves in this way is so jumpy.
In fact, the film is okay, but I was "lied" by such a literary poster and title. The mood of liking the picture but not the plot is really struggling! I wanted to abandon it several times, but I finished reading it with procrastination.
View more about In Your Eyes reviews
