I said that this film is working hard, which is probably the most prominent point.
The heroine is a literary and artistic young woman, a believer of "empathy" (I think "NOOOO, not again" after reading "Hyberlian"), and she wants to go to Paris to talk about academics with a professor. Fred's magazine, as well as Fred himself, took a fancy to her, and on the condition of taking her to Paris, he put the young literary girl (half-push half-worked) on the road of no return (vanity road). In this process, the young literary and artistic young women smashed the magazine and the male protagonist in the name of academic and purity. Of course, in the end, he abandoned the academic road and the male protagonist lived a vain life wearing Givenchy every day.
But why did I return the four stars. . . It really doesn't make sense.
This seems to be the first time I have watched Fred's movie in a theater.
This film can actually be made interesting in many places. If it is filmed now, it can be very ironic and interesting. But in this film, all the points except Hepburn have been changing clothes. . . Neither played well.
First, the positioning of the heroine, a young literary girl, is actually very current, and the story of Mary Su, where the bookstore clerk turned into a supermodel, is straightforward. Now that we are filming this, the screenwriter will definitely make a face of the young literary girl every minute, and if she doesn't do everything she promised, what ideals should we talk about?
Second, if we don't talk about the professional quality of the heroine, let's talk about the contradiction between her ideal and reality. At first the heroine thinks fashion is superficial, but in order to go to Paris to talk about philosophy, she can enter the fashion industry. Then I fell in love with the photographer, which means I fell in love with the superficial life. Then I met the professor and fell in love with philosophy again. Then he discovered that the professor just wanted to hold his little hand and kiss his little mouth, and suddenly said, "You don't speak like a philosopher, like a man!" I WAS LIKE, WTH. . . The screenwriter actually drove a few guns in his head. It's not that women shouldn't be pure, but this role modeling is really drunk. At the end, the heroine seemed to feel that "men are all big bad wolves", and completed the fashion show honestly, and then ran to the location shooting location alone in a wedding dress and cried until the hero came over to sing her. A song, two people standing on a raft, down the river, the two sides are full of chickens, ducks and geese... What the hell, there is no female consciousness... You said why I expect female consciousness in a song and dance film, that is Because at the beginning the hero and the heroine met in the bookstore, the nerdy child owner told the hero a bunch of philosophical concepts, and then said that he was a believer in "empathy", that is, "to empathize with others' feelings and thoughts." At this time, the hero suddenly put the bookstore in He pulled the ladder over and kissed the heroine. The heroine showed a fawn-like panic and said, "What are you doing!?" The heroine said, "I think you want to be kissed now." Then the heroine was scolded by the heroine and ran away. . . Then the heroine sang a song in the bookstore that was academically at odds with the girl's heart... I thought I was going to make a fuss about this... As a result, and! No! have!
Third, I feel Hepburn is trying hard to break through himself. trying too hard. It is difficult to be too beautiful, and the role type is too single, and it is difficult to break through (in fact, it is still a problem of ability). In this film, she tries hard to show the comedian side, and even dances modern dance. But it hurts no matter how you look at it. But after all, it is the issue of screenwriters, or the issue of the entire Hollywood industry. If this character can really be written as weird and talk like a cannon, yes, just write it to her in the style of Catherine Hepburn, this role will be much better.
Fourth, Fred still has few roles, I want to watch Fred ONLY!
In short, every second is a harbinger of the end of the song and dance film. . . The highlight of this film is actually here. Speaking of ideological connotation... it is better to listen to Chubaca roar for 100 minutes.
View more about Funny Face reviews
