As if not at all. It is difficult to guess what the author intended to express in this drama, the multi-faceted human nature? Complex love? Unspeakable life? Wild nature? It seems to be both, and it seems to be neither. There is absolutely no doubt that this is a tragedy.
So I tried to explore the source of this tragedy.
The first thing that comes to mind is Serena. The hostess seems to be the craziest character in the film. She instructed Galloway to hunt down the maid and her illegitimate child, worsening the relationship with her husband and forcing their marriage to come to an end. But is she the source of evil? She fights for her love, fights for her man, and works hard for her happiness. At work, he sacrificed his body for the lives of workers, and lost the ability to be a mother forever. She didn't want to see her husband pass away, so she let herself die. Serena does not seem to be the source of the tragedy, but a victim of it.
The second thing that comes to mind is the male protagonist’s friends. Jiyou looked down on women, and often missed the opportunity to suppress the heroine. In the end, because of the failure of bribery, he bit the hero and made the hero at a loss. Finally, he had no choice but to be killed by the hero in the bear hunt. The hostess said that the base friend has never been a friend of the male host. The male protagonist wanted to say something but shyly didn't dare to admit it. Maybe when they raised their guns to aim at each other, and when they were competing with a quick gun, the male protagonist finally realized that he really didn't have this friend. But Jiyou died too early, and it is not the source of all tragedies.
So is it the female partner, the maid kid, who doesn't make much appearance in it? The maid child is pregnant with an illegitimate child, has given birth to an illegitimate child, and appears in front of the hostess many times. Although not explicitly stated and more cautious, it feels not so low-key. At least he often runs out to take pictures, go to church, work with the male leader, and ask for money. Finally ran to the north to live a new life, the child was saved, and he had a new boyfriend. So is the result of this junior third too good? If it feels that it's all Miscellaneous's fault, it seems that the conclusion is too arbitrary. When I think about it, I might realize that Xiaosan actually appeared before the heroine. Therefore, when the heroine first arrives in Kiba, she tells the hero that nothing that happened before we knew it did not exist. It seems that the maid is not easy, and she is also a victim of tragedy.
So the result seems obvious. Let's analyze the male lead. This looks very handsome, very thick and brave, and many golden Kiba male gods, what did he do in the story. The male protagonist became lonely and unbearable, so at the beginning of the scene, he asked his subordinates to pimp and the maid to solve his physical needs, which caused the maid to get pregnant first when she was unmarried, and finally gave birth to her own illegitimate child. Then she married the heroine, thinking that she had subdued the wild and wonderful person, and logically, the heroine was also pregnant. Then the male protagonist instructs his friend to pay bribes. The base friend is caught with a pigtail and contradicts the male protagonist. The male protagonist kills the base friend without doing anything. In the next step, the prenatal blood collapse of the heroine leads to lifelong infertility. The hero finds that he can't only love the heroine as he promised, or misses his illegitimate child, so he secretly accepts the mistress. Towards the end, the male protagonist made the most unsuccessful choice. For the sake of an illegitimate child, he lost his life or life in the future. He threw the two books to the police station and went to rescue the maid’s family. In the end, the male protagonist still did not resist his urge to "kill a cheetah". During the hunt, instead of killing the cheetah, he was bitten by a mountain wolf.
The male protagonist and the mountain wolf matter locked each other up, as if they were saying that they would be challenged by the wild, and in the process they would risk being killed by the wild. This seems to be a metaphor for the relationship between the male lead and the female lead. Some people may say that this is the conclusion of the two men each playing 50 rebounds, but I don't think so. Because of this, the heroine has become a negative metaphor. But as analyzed above, she is not the source of the tragedy.
From another point of view, the wild has always existed, why can't it coexist with the wild, but have to challenge it? The male protagonist created the tragedy of two women, two families, and led to the deaths of more other people. But in the end, he died in his own hands. This is a dark humorous ending, reminiscent of causal reincarnation. Contrary to what the heroine said at the beginning of the film that "there is no previous occurrence", what you say and do will definitely have retribution. What you've done will haunt you. There are no assumptions on a timeline, but maybe the decision made by the hero from the beginning is not the most sensible decision.
In the wrong choice, he finished his destiny. The beginning of the tragedy led to the end of the tragedy.
View more about Serena reviews
