Everyone's reaction was quite interesting. Most people think this is a bad film, but some of them think that the road in the middle is interesting but the ending is disappointing and speechless, while others, such as me, think that the first half is hard to see but the end is a bright spot. At first I thought that this is probably the difference between unmarried people and married people, but this division is a bit narrow. Maybe it is the difference between sentimentalism and sentimentalism? In fact, I have been thinking about this issue recently. Two of my friends who are married feel pain because of the boring marriage, and there are men around them who make their heartbeat aggravate the original pain. I thought for a long time, but still no solution. What to do? I can only record these questions and the half-advanced thoughts first.
Why do people swear to defend "freedom", follow "feeling", and grasp the fleeting and uncertain "love"? Perhaps it is because this is the highest and farest being close to eternity that a person can glimpse in a small and limited life. People really have too little love and too much restraint. It is really hard to give up what is left.
What is freedom? Since people have their own definitions, I just simplified my definitions into "more autonomy" and "less controlled".
What is the feeling? People often say to listen to their inner voices and follow their own feelings. It seems that they are equated most of the time. Where does the feeling of the necessary factors of love come from? Hormones? The ethereal desire is projected on a certain goal? The mirror in the heart reflects the fuzzy outline? When the time is still, the genie plucks the strings? Suddenly I can't distinguish clearly, and I feel spontaneous or triggered.
When we pursue freedom, do we pursue the freedom of the heart? Yes. What are we going to break free? This generation is bent and paradoxical to the rules of the game, fast-forwarded, piled up material needs...too many, only to talk about "love", such as humble worldly prejudices, "ethical shackles", or just the heart Timidity? Then the question that I didn't think about clearly in the previous paragraph, because it is often impossible to know the source and attributes of "feeling", can it be determined that it is the "inner heart" that needs to be pursued? Is it possible that it is an external interference that hinders inner freedom?
what is love? "Love" is too complicated and rich. Let's only explore the relationship between "love" and "feeling". Love mostly germinates from the initial feeling-heartbeat and joy, but what is the difference between "I feel for you/I am moved/I like you" and "I love you"?
"Love" must be more affectionate and deeper. Although in the above phrases, "like" and "love" are both verbs, the former is more functionally inclined to express state, starting from "I" and radiating naturally to "you", filled with a strong "I" right The feeling of "you"; and love is closer to the appearance of behavior, with "you" as the end point and "I" active output, so there will be phrases connected with love-the ability of love, the power of love, the energy of love etc. I sometimes ponder these words. "The ability to love" seems to be a little utilitarian because of its result-oriented. "The power of love" is a bit clumsy, and the "energy of love" appears mechanical, etc., but at least they all show that love is more than just Relying on feeling, it needs the will to push and operate for a long time.
Speaking of "will", it seems to immediately become less arbitrary and less "free". So we continue to think about the relationship between "love" and "freedom"? Are we free in the process of loving someone? With reference to the previous crude definition of "freedom" "more autonomy" and "less controlled", it seems difficult to agree that "loving someone" is very free. It is true that we are free to be attracted and feel in an open state, and we are also free to pursue what we love, but once we move from our "like" state to a state of "love" involving the other party, we are partly offered The heart loses part of its freedom. What's interesting is that I think the most free part of myself is that I have the right to choose what I love, decide to love him, and continue to love without being influenced by others. This "love" comes from one's own heart, and when it is difficult, it relies on the will, without restricting the orchestrations and control of feelings, so to a certain extent, it is free.
Not a movie review, just thinking about it.
View more about Forces of Nature reviews
