Is this a movie about philosophy? Stop it, the movie is just to show how philosophy professors are forced to die when they are broken in love. This game has only one problem from beginning to end-if you start again, will you choose me?
In order to ensure that the answer is obtained, the professor interferes with the experiment and asks the heroine and her boyfriend to draw designated identities so that this question can be answered separately under different questions.
[First simulation] The
heroine’s boyfriend is set as an ordinary person, the professor is set as a mysterious role, and the heroine chooses her boyfriend and thinks the professor is a threat. However, there was an unexpected situation in the first test. Because the professor killed the poet hastily, the heroine colluded with everyone to kill him before he entered the refuge.
The professor failed to get an answer.
[Second simulation] The
professor further modified the title. The heroine and boyfriend were set to be gay, and the professor was set to be a mandatory role because he had the only escape code. As a result, the heroine still chooses her boyfriend, and only reluctantly chooses the professor as revenge when her boyfriend cheats. The professor chooses to die.
After two rounds of experiments, the professor determined that the heroine had no good feelings for him (she interpreted the mysterious identity as a threat) and no longer loved him (only as a tool for revenge on her lover). If all experiments are over here, the professor will commit suicide as planned. But the plot turns, the heroine and boyfriend expose the experimental interference set by the professor, and the heroine immediately understands the professor's intentions and intends to save the professor.
[Third simulation] The
previous title setting remains unchanged, but the heroine has the right to choose. She re-selected the people who entered the shelter from the perspective of human nature, and came up with a brand new answer: People are mortal, and I would rather end everything with dignity in love than to seek life and death in a utilitarian heart.
The heroine's intention to save the professor is not obscure, the most obvious is to leave behind the poet. In the first two simulations, the character of the poet was shot ruthlessly by the professor, representing "self-hatred." To leave a poet is to save the professor.
After the three simulations, the hostess specially left the enlightening professor: I do not love him because you are you. So, you don't have to hurt yourself.
If you start again, will you choose me? ——No, but I like you and hope you love yourself.
The professor was relieved and rescued.
View more about After the Dark reviews
