Although the original work is more verbose, the running account is also reported too much!

Francisca 2022-10-22 18:38:20

It's totally a personal complaint, don't read it if you don't like it... It

's too difficult to incorporate the content of the three books into such a few episodes of TV series!
I have read the original novel before, so when I watched this film, I always felt like I was being rushed forward with a whip from behind.
Too anxious, the plot is not well laid out, and the character's character is not well shaped.
Although the original work is actually British Qiong Yao, it is also a more verbose writing, but the TV series is too compressed...Several wonderful passages have been suppressed. Especially in the most exciting part of the boat delivery in "The Daughter of the King", it was actually taken like this. This paragraph was originally written in bloody despair... Personally, I think it is the best paragraph in Gregory's book...
Only when I saw the third episode, Marguerite of Anjou hasn't appeared yet. The perspectives of the three women cut to and fro (because it was four, Isabel and Annie appeared together almost in the first half), and everyone’s story was not clearly explained, Elizabeth and Tudor, his mother, Margaret. It’s a little bit better. What is Annie’s side? It’s all about reporting... (I don’t know how to run away with Richard’s monastery in a hurry...)
But you have to say it’s compact. , And spent a lot of time slowly expressing Elizabeth and Edward's horrible "love". The point of witchcraft is also too simple and rude... In short, the rhythm of the play is all chaotic.
The most annoying was his performance towards Warwick. When he appeared on the stage, he was a standard villain who beats a mandarin duck. He spoke indiscreetly. (In addition, this Warwick looked familiar, he played in Tudor. The people of Remwell... or I’m blind again), just demote this big conspirator... in the play, Warwick is portrayed as an arrogant, greedy and cruel traitor. In fact, ...It's not like this [fog] at all, it actually seems to be like this...but it can't be handled so simply and rudely. Warwick would only be countered if he was forced by the Rivers family. Why is he angry? It's because he was a father and a big brother, raised from a young age, and how the church fought and governed the country [beloved] Edward was snatched away by a wild woman who didn't know where he came from! [Fog] Two years of painstaking efforts to conclude a contract with France was ruined. The brother was dismissed and the fiance who wanted to point his daughter was snatched away. The two daughters were quite old (by the standard at that time). If you can't get married, you'll be suppressed in the court...Is it irritating for everyone!
Is the Rivers family okay? It doesn't matter which family... (with prejudice...)
It's far away... The above is the product of too big brains... Please forgive me...
Anyway, history is like that, the ending everyone I knew it a long time ago. There is no such thing as "Wheel of Destiny". No matter whether it is a novel or a TV series, what everyone sees is just a YY. But since it's adapted from the novel, can you dig deeper into the character's personality, don't be so running accounts, dualistic...
PS: I would like to praise the cast of the three Yorkers. Edward's charisma, George's handsomeness and Richard's loyalty are all written...Like!

View more about The White Queen reviews